Notices
JK Talk General discussion forum regarding thoughts, opinions and rumors about the Jeep JK Wrangler or related subjects that don't quite fit in the Modified, Stock or Electronics forums.

Jeep wont go WOT?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:02 PM
  #11  
glennco's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Appleton, WI
Default

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the computer won't give you wot under a certain rpm.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:15 PM
  #12  
racinfast002's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by JEEP THRILLS
70 ish isn't an rpm.

you can still lug an engine at 70

its all in the power curve and with the 3.8 any W.O.T under 2500rpm would be concidered lugging
ok let me back up...I was rolling down the highway at 70. I tried gears 4th through 6th. I don't know when the last time you had your jeep in 4th going 70 with 3.73's out back and 32" tires, but thats a shit ton of rpm. I even briefly tried 3rd, but that was about redline and honestly didn't keep it there long enough to see what was going on. Don't make me bust out my data logger to show yall what is going on.

Summary-no matter the rpm, the jk will not go 100% WOT
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:45 PM
  #13  
ezav8tr's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
Vet Army

 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

I would bet at a higher altitude (where the air is less dense) it would open the throttle fully, trying to get more air in. Like you said though, in 4th gear, doing 70, with the high RPM, I don't see why it wouldn't open all the way.

Try asking a master mechanic (or whatever their title is), because I would also bet that it isn't just your jeep, but possibly all newer cars that have the same computer logic.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 04:53 AM
  #14  
racinfast002's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by ezav8tr
Try asking a master mechanic (or whatever their title is), because I would also bet that it isn't just your jeep, but possibly all newer cars that have the same computer logic.
I would guess its software limited. We all complain about how underpowered the Jeep is. A simple solution to that is to use all the available performance in the engine you would think
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 06:37 AM
  #15  
Alec's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 553
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Default

Again, just adding more air won't do anything if the motor can't use it.

The computer is constantly monitoring manifold pressure, O2 sensors, load, and other factors. It's more complex than just dumping more air and fuel into the cylinders. If it can't efficiently make more power with the available and and fuel, it's going to let the rpms rise before giving more of either.

I think it boils down to two large limiting factors:
1) intake manifold design. The intake manifold is optimized for midrange torque and not top end hp. Once manifold pressure rises to zero vacuum, the manifold cannot efficiently use more air volume (unless you add forced induction).
2) emissions. Just dumping more air and fuel into the cylinders beyond the efficiency range will result in higher emissions, which much of the programming is trying to avoid. I'm sure aftermarket programmers help with this, but they don't eliminate it.

I have the procomp/hypertech tune on 87. From watching my vacuum gauge and feel, mine is still limiting throttle opening on the highway to varying degrees. But it is always once vacuum reaches zero.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 06:58 AM
  #16  
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 2
From: GRANDE PRAIRIE, AB
Default

Originally Posted by Alec
Again, just adding more air won't do anything if the motor can't use it.

The computer is constantly monitoring manifold pressure, O2 sensors, load, and other factors. It's more complex than just dumping more air and fuel into the cylinders.

2) emissions. Just dumping more air and fuel into the cylinders beyond the efficiency range will result in higher emissions, which much of the programming is trying to avoid. I'm sure aftermarket programmers help with this, but they don't eliminate it.
bingo. the engines biggest concern is emissions. power is almost just a bi-product
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 07:01 AM
  #17  
racinfast002's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

interesting thought on manifold pressure. I'll have to set everything up to take a look at that data and see. I agree, if the pressure reaches 0, then its maxed out. Good thought!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 07:58 AM
  #18  
racinfast002's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Did some data logging on the way to lunch. It appears y'all are right. It maxes out manifold pressure way early.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #19  
hardcoreoffroad's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Monroe Mi.
Default so change out the manifold for more throtle power usage

So change out the intake manifold for more power. If they make one for it.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #20  
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 2
From: GRANDE PRAIRIE, AB
Default

this is good info.

so would it be possible to create more vaccuum somehow

is intake design the only way or larger throttle body or a spacer wich I always thought were total snake oil

as I understand it, the throttle plate isn't open all the way because it doesn't need more air.(perfect fuel to air ratio)

adding more fuel won't help at this point because you are at 0 vac.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 PM.