mt's vs at's

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

May 30, 2007 | 10:11 AM

#21

GMAN

JK Enthusiast

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 388

Likes: 0

From: London, Ontario

Quote:

Originally Posted by simon

Man TJWorld, I can't even read what you wrote. Your avatar keeps hypnotizing me.

Wow, she moves now!

May 30, 2007 | 08:30 PM

#22

rupedog

JK Super Freak

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 1,037

Likes: 0

From: Springfield, Oregon

Quote:

Originally Posted by simon

I just gave bfg a call and they said that the date is not yet definite,
but it will be out by year-end. I tried to find some info, but could not.
I think I found a picture though:

Current:

New:

As I said, looks like the Krawlers.

Thanks simon, those look great. I sure hope they make the size I want. Even if I wasn't an off roader I would get those just for the look.

May 30, 2007 | 09:38 PM

#23

Dizzyliz

JK Jedi

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 5,253

Likes: 5

From: Foresthill, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by rsl52

What about noise on the highway with mts?

I don't notice the noise in the new Jeep-
but the older models- yes.
...Voice of experiance.

May 30, 2007 | 10:44 PM

#24

Northernmedic

JK Freak

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 816

Likes: 0

From: Hinton, Alberta

What about the white stuff?

I'm in the same boat considering BFG M/T and the A/T. Anyone use these in both deep snow and ice (Northern Alberta here...got the white powder 8 months of the year).

May 30, 2007 | 10:59 PM

#25

Dizzyliz

JK Jedi

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 5,253

Likes: 5

From: Foresthill, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northernmedic

I'm in the same boat considering BFG M/T and the A/T. Anyone use these in both deep snow and ice (Northern Alberta here...got the white powder 8 months of the year).

I get the white stuff here too & vote for the M/T

Reply Subscribe

Reply Share

First
Prev
3 / 3
Next
Last