Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

35's boggin jeep down

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 8, 2011 | 05:51 AM
  #21  
Rtwill78's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 128
Likes: 1
From: Moore, Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by jeeeep
the difference calculates to about a +500rpm difference at .83- when approaching the upper RPM's makes a difference:

4.88's w/35's .69 @ 70mph approx 2400 rpm

4.88's w/35's .83 @70mph approx 2900 rpm - lock out OD you're close to 3500rpm. with the added power of the new v6 why run such high rpm, not necessary

They're geared that way since the majority of the torque is I. The upper rpm ranges on the 3.6, even more so than the 3.8's. I'm running 35's with 4.88's on my 6-Speed 3.8 and it made a huge difference from the 3.21's! As has been mentioned You need to do the Math or find a chart (where someone else has done the math) before
choosing your ratio though. Get it wrong and it'll be costly to redo.

RT
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2011 | 04:29 PM
  #22  
bgall's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery,AL
Default

I have a pretty new 2012 unlimited rubi auto. It has the 4.1 gears. With 34.4 inch Falken Wildpeaks I have zero performance problems. It drives great at both highway (70-75) and in town. Acceleration from stop in town is fine. If you plan to stop at 35 in tires I would say the 4.1 gears will be fine. Also keep in mind that the computer is in breaking mode for the first 300 miles. Make your judgement after that. I would definitely not want to "daily driver" anything less that 4.1 with 35s in a 2012 unlimited.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 05:26 AM
  #23  
Ryan0260's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,054
Likes: 85
From: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by jeeeep
the difference calculates to about a +500rpm difference at .83- when approaching the upper RPM's makes a difference:

4.88's w/35's .69 @ 70mph approx 2400 rpm

4.88's w/35's .83 @70mph approx 2900 rpm - lock out OD you're close to 3500rpm. with the added power of the new v6 why run such high rpm, not necessary
If its geared correctly you shouldn't have to turn off the overdrive...I would rather turn a higher rpm and have the added torque anyways. Not to mention a lower crawl ratio off road
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 06:19 AM
  #24  
JK_09's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Huber Heights, OH
Default

Ive driven a 35" tired 2012 Unlimited with 3.73 some, and it runs just fine.

3.21 would suck Im betting
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #25  
Rugbyduck's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Tigard, OR
Default

5.13's are the way to go. I've never looked back!
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 03:43 PM
  #26  
cloddhopper's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Turlock, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by JK_09
Ive driven a 35" tired 2012 Unlimited with 3.73 some, and it runs just fine.

3.21 would suck Im betting
Any comments on this post? I have 3.73 on a 12' sport and was contemplating 35's....but maybe not.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 04:06 PM
  #27  
f2fast4u's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

A completely broken-in 3.6L with auto, 35's, and 4.10's runs like a spotted ape. Do the searches.

Why anyone would recommend taller gears is completely unfounded. But the one common thing from all is that asthmatic 3.8L, not the 3.6L - apples and oranges.

Plus, you have to tell the computer, somehow, that the tire size has changed... and there are several ways to do that. I used AEV Procal, but there are other players too.

Last edited by f2fast4u; Nov 10, 2011 at 04:33 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 07:36 PM
  #28  
FJ Jake's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Hope Valley, RI
Default

I have already ordered the 4.88. What would be the downside of them vs lower gear?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 07:47 PM
  #29  
tommyluv78's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: richburg, south carolina
Default

i put 5.13's in 3 weeks ago. shoould have done it as soon as i changed out my wheels.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 05:53 AM
  #30  
Merlin4979's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by f2fast4u
A completely broken-in 3.6L with auto, 35's, and 4.10's runs like a spotted ape. Do the searches.

Why anyone would recommend taller gears is completely unfounded. But the one common thing from all is that asthmatic 3.8L, not the 3.6L - apples and oranges.

Plus, you have to tell the computer, somehow, that the tire size has changed... and there are several ways to do that. I used AEV Procal, but there are other players too.
^^^This. Anyone who keeps recommending 5.13's needs to realize that the 2012's with the new engine and tranny is a completely different setup, and doesn't need to be regeared nearly as low. Basically, the new 3.6 engine/auto tranny version of a 4.10 is the equivalent of the 3.8's version of a 4.88.


Originally Posted by FJ Jake
I have already ordered the 4.88. What would be the downside of them vs lower gear?
You'll be fine with any ratio of 4.10 to 4.88. Depending on what type of driving you do, it will either let the Jeep accelerate easier with the 4.88's, but lose a little MPG and rev higher at higher speeds. The 4.10's will not accelerate as easily as the 4.88's, but if you do a lot of highway driving, they would be better for not revving as high when you're going 75 mph.

Last edited by Merlin4979; Nov 11, 2011 at 05:56 AM.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:58 AM.