The width of the rim also makes a difference. The MFG's specs for height are based on a specific rim width. My 255/85-16 KM2s are 33.3" according to BFG on a 7" wide rim. The range is 6.5" to 8". Mounted on my stock 16x7 steel rims @ 35psi I measured them just a hair over the spec. Aftermoving to my 16x8 ProComps I measured them at just a hair over 33". Keep in mind the measurement is from the center of the tread and that the MFG measurement DOES NOT include a loaded vehicle on them.

 

36 inches. That's consistent with what I recall being stated in the past, but am hoping to hear more anecdotal "statistics".

Exactly, interested in loaded ride height although others make an excellent point with respect to inflation and wheel dimensions. Anyone else??

 

my 37's measured 36" with 28psi once mounted.

 

Thanks. Looks like 36" is the mean so far. Curious if anyone has measured around 36.5 . . . I have seen 35.5 before.

 

mud grapplers and mtr's run basically the truest tire size as advertised..

 

That's what I've heard. Wonder if that's because they start out taller, say 37.5 inches then "deform" to a height closer to advertised, or if their sidewalls are stiffer thus preventing the large height loss that the KM2s apparently experience.

 

When I was getting my MTR-ks mounted there was a kid there getting 35x1250r15s installed, an mounted, at pressure, my 35x1250r17s were bigger just some food for thought.

And mine measure to 34.5 inch at ride height

 

Depends on wheel width to.

 

Both were 8.5

 

This, unfortunately, is very true. They couldn't get one of my five to balance, static, dynamic, and road forced, ended up ordering me a new tire, which balanced fine.