Bushwacker vs. Xenon
"better" is subjective but, having seen both in person, i think the bushwackers look way more factory, i like the fact that they don't sag and, they aren't as hard as the xenons. i have personally seen a xenon hit a rock really hard on the rubicon and, while it looked great after the fact, the body it was attached to didn't. the xenon ended up being so tough that it traslated all of the energy from the hit and put it right into the body of the jeep and damaged it.
Originally Posted by wayoflife
"better" is subjective but, having seen both in person, i think the bushwackers look way more factory, i like the fact that they don't sag and, they aren't as hard as the xenons. i have personally seen a xenon hit a rock really hard on the rubicon and, while it looked great after the fact, the body it was attached to didn't. the xenon ended up being so tough that it traslated all of the energy from the hit and put it right into the body of the jeep and damaged it.
All of the above helped me decide in purchasing a set of narrow Xenon's for my JK. Can't wait to install them this weekend!!!
Trending Topics

The Xenon's are made of a urethane, which flexes a lot more than the plastic of the Bushwackers. Xenon has also provided braces for the newer flat fenders to keep them from sagging.


