Input Needed to Help Make a Difficult Decision (Wheels or Suspension)
#1
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Input Needed to Help Make a Difficult Decision (Wheels or Suspension)
I need your help! I'm having the hardest time deciding on my next purchase...should it be wheels (and focus on looks) or suspension (begin to improve trail capabilities)???
By way of back ground (if you have seen my build thread you'd know), this is a 3 year project putting me at the Rubicon trail in 2017. I have already added front bumper, winch, and rock rails and will be for sure adding the rear bumper. The question I have is do I finish out the "looks package" and add ATX Camber Pro II beadlocks on 35" Nitto Trail Grapplers (black with an Orange Ring) and stuff a budget boost in with inexpensive Fox shocks to clear my 35's (with a plan to upgrade the suspension either next year or the following...once I figure out which is more priority, better lift or skids and roll cage). OR stick with the stock wheels and go ahead a pick up the EVO Enforcer with King 2.5 Res shocks with the intent to tackle the wheels at a later date.
The conundrum is...
If I do wheels first:
I most likely won't be doing a significant amount of hardcore wheeling for a couple of years and technically wouldn't NEED beadlocks for the wheeling I'd be doing (on a positive note, I'll be able to keep my orange ring all pretty for a bit, lol). I'm questioning this route b'c I don't want to create a maintenance issue for a product I don't need, but I KNOW I will eventually get/and need beadlocks and I certainly don't want to buy a second set of wheels.
If I do suspension first:
I'm not fully convinced the King bolt-on coilover system isn't where I eventually want to be (the Enforcer kit would be a major waste of money if I ultimately decide to go this route). But I fight with this approach b'c I know that coilovers are probable overkill (I just don't want to limit what I want to do in the future...don't know how crazy this rigs going to get, lol).
Either route, I'd be throwing away $300-$600 bucks this go around (budget boost or spacers).
Rig will be used as a DD, wheeled once a month (or so), and most interested in LCOG (minimal lift...just enough to fit tires and not lose travel, up or down)
All ideas are welcome, even if you think I should trash both ideas and go a completely different route.
By way of back ground (if you have seen my build thread you'd know), this is a 3 year project putting me at the Rubicon trail in 2017. I have already added front bumper, winch, and rock rails and will be for sure adding the rear bumper. The question I have is do I finish out the "looks package" and add ATX Camber Pro II beadlocks on 35" Nitto Trail Grapplers (black with an Orange Ring) and stuff a budget boost in with inexpensive Fox shocks to clear my 35's (with a plan to upgrade the suspension either next year or the following...once I figure out which is more priority, better lift or skids and roll cage). OR stick with the stock wheels and go ahead a pick up the EVO Enforcer with King 2.5 Res shocks with the intent to tackle the wheels at a later date.
The conundrum is...
If I do wheels first:
I most likely won't be doing a significant amount of hardcore wheeling for a couple of years and technically wouldn't NEED beadlocks for the wheeling I'd be doing (on a positive note, I'll be able to keep my orange ring all pretty for a bit, lol). I'm questioning this route b'c I don't want to create a maintenance issue for a product I don't need, but I KNOW I will eventually get/and need beadlocks and I certainly don't want to buy a second set of wheels.
If I do suspension first:
I'm not fully convinced the King bolt-on coilover system isn't where I eventually want to be (the Enforcer kit would be a major waste of money if I ultimately decide to go this route). But I fight with this approach b'c I know that coilovers are probable overkill (I just don't want to limit what I want to do in the future...don't know how crazy this rigs going to get, lol).
Either route, I'd be throwing away $300-$600 bucks this go around (budget boost or spacers).
Rig will be used as a DD, wheeled once a month (or so), and most interested in LCOG (minimal lift...just enough to fit tires and not lose travel, up or down)
All ideas are welcome, even if you think I should trash both ideas and go a completely different route.
#2
JK Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Joliet Illinois
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you mentioned LCOG. And I know I will get a lot of hate for this suggestion. If you are only going with 35's I suggest buying the tires first, 1.25 bodylift, and if you want more clearance cut the fenders. My jeep has a body lift I bought off of ebay for $125. Most people don't realize I have one. I wanted LCOG because I like hill climbs and off camber trails. Yes adding a 3 to 6 inch body lift is dumb. But body lifts do have thier place. In your case with LCOG this would be one place to consider a BL.
Just curious.... You near Marble Falls? Hidden falls is fun. Only been there once tho!
Just curious.... You near Marble Falls? Hidden falls is fun. Only been there once tho!
Last edited by WINGIT; 06-20-2014 at 08:19 AM.
#3
JK Jedi
if your going coilover i wouldnt go with evo bolt ons... you can get the same travel shocks and coils to work for significantly less..
if you want lcog dont get a lift and run the 35s. i dont get the whole lcog idea most people have involving a lift... if i were to do a lcog build id try and fit 40s on no lift or less than stock height and still have 5-6 uptravel..
if you want lcog dont get a lift and run the 35s. i dont get the whole lcog idea most people have involving a lift... if i were to do a lcog build id try and fit 40s on no lift or less than stock height and still have 5-6 uptravel..
Last edited by Maertz; 06-20-2014 at 08:18 AM.
#5
JK Jedi Master
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin <--> Colorado Springs
Posts: 11,465
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes
on
154 Posts
Why are you so set on throwing money at something now, when you don't really know what you want to end up with, and still have three years to plan it out. Seems that it would make more sense to drive what you have and buy later when you have a better clue.
#6
If I were going LCG, I would go with the Metalcloak Overline fenders, and put the 35s on. Metalcloak claims their Overline Fenders will enable you to run a 37 with no lift.
JK Wrangler Fenders and Body Armor
If you go bigger tires, your going to need to beef up that front axle.
Good luck with your build.
JK Wrangler Fenders and Body Armor
If you go bigger tires, your going to need to beef up that front axle.
Good luck with your build.
#7
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I may have just answered my own question, lol.
Trending Topics
#8
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I were going LCG, I would go with the Metalcloak Overline fenders, and put the 35s on. Metalcloak claims their Overline Fenders will enable you to run a 37 with no lift. JK Wrangler Fenders and Body Armor If you go bigger tires, your going to need to beef up that front axle. Good luck with your build.
Also, I'm planning to cut my current fenders...for free (and I really like that price point, lol)
#9
JK Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I were going LCG, I would go with the Metalcloak Overline fenders, and put the 35s on. Metalcloak claims their Overline Fenders will enable you to run a 37 with no lift. JK Wrangler Fenders and Body Armor If you go bigger tires, your going to need to beef up that front axle. Good luck with your build.