Long Arm Upgrade Worth It?
Thread Starter
JK Freak
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Humble, Texas
3.75" is definitely the minimum BS I would run with the EVO bolt ons, when i get some mud on the front tires and do full turns some of the mud will rub off on the coils...on the rears when the axle is fully dropped the rear swaybar bolt will also rub my tires. When I do go with a different set of wheels or beadlocks I will get a 3.5" BS.
Man...if you want you could test drive my Jeep, I also drive about 50-60 miles a day in all kinds of Texas roads, wouldnt do anything else but coilovers..they are woorrttthh it.
Man...if you want you could test drive my Jeep, I also drive about 50-60 miles a day in all kinds of Texas roads, wouldnt do anything else but coilovers..they are woorrttthh it.
Right now I'm leaning to the TF lift. So if anyone else has any other opinions (pros/cons) of these three long arms I would still like to hear them.
Sponsoring Vendor
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: FULLERTON,CA
I'm at 3.84" BS which equals right at 1/8" difference if my math is right. I almost want to chance it but i doubt if I had a problem it would be covered since its clearly stated 3.75" is required.
I'm running Bilstein 5100s right now, if I went with EVO Double D and kept these shocks would the ride suffer? I dont think I could swing the lift plus Kings.
I'm running Bilstein 5100s right now, if I went with EVO Double D and kept these shocks would the ride suffer? I dont think I could swing the lift plus Kings.
These kits are made in the USA.
Thread Starter
JK Freak
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Humble, Texas
Originally Posted by jetmechabq
i have a 4" TF kit with 35's and it's like a factory ride and performs well offraod. unless it's a trailer queen then TF long arm provides the best of both.