Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Rim Sizing.

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 29, 2014 | 06:42 AM
  #1  
FullMetalJacket's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Sussex, WI
Default Rim Sizing.

I would like to hear some opinions on rims sizes. Specifically rim widths. I'm looking at getting 17" Method rim with a 4.5" backspacing. This particular rim available in 8",8.5" and 9" widths. I plan on running 35x12.5x17 tires. What are the pros and cons of any of these widths?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2014 | 07:45 AM
  #2  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

footprint and the wider the wheel the more it will stick out past the fenders if comparing the same bs. You are really not going to be able to tell a whole lot of difference between those three sizes and would look to your tire manufacture specs when it comes to recommendations. Personally I like a thinner width as you get more tire bulge past the actual wheel for a litttle more protection against rubbing the wheel on obstacles.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2014 | 07:57 AM
  #3  
jadmt's Avatar
JK Jedi
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 107
From: missoula,mt
Default

same sort of question or just thinking out loud. I have 17x9 Raceline monsters (non bead lock) rims sitting in a ups truck 4.5" backspace and -12 offset. I am going to run 35x12.5-17 tires. I was originally thinking I would need that size rim but now I am second guessing and wished I would have went with a narrower rim with less offset. Got a great deal on the rims on a black Friday sale but now I am worried they will stick out too far. My last rims were Pintlers with 5.2 backspacing with +10 offset.
It does seem like a lot of 35x12.5-17 suggest 8.5-11" rims.

Last edited by jadmt; Nov 29, 2014 at 08:02 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2014 | 08:15 AM
  #4  
FullMetalJacket's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Sussex, WI
Default

Originally Posted by TheDirtman
footprint and the wider the wheel the more it will stick out past the fenders if comparing the same bs. You are really not going to be able to tell a whole lot of difference between those three sizes and would look to your tire manufacture specs when it comes to recommendations. Personally I like a thinner width as you get more tire bulge past the actual wheel for a litttle more protection against rubbing the wheel on obstacles.
Very valid point regarding tire bulge protection on a thinner rim. I just installed a Rubicon Express 2.5" lift and have stock fenders still. Fender rub may be a concern with a wider rim but I do not have disconnects, so flexing will be limited by my bump stops for now. Would a wider rim still be an issue or is the 12.5" wide tire foot print the determining factor?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2014 | 08:34 AM
  #5  
robsjeep9's Avatar
JK Junkie
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 3
From: Kitchener
Default

Originally Posted by TheDirtman
footprint and the wider the wheel the more it will stick out past the fenders if comparing the same bs. You are really not going to be able to tell a whole lot of difference between those three sizes and would look to your tire manufacture specs when it comes to recommendations. Personally I like a thinner width as you get more tire bulge past the actual wheel for a litttle more protection against rubbing the wheel on obstacles.
Question with this set up are you more or less prone to blow a bead this way or not?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2014 | 11:00 AM
  #6  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

It should be harder to break a bead on a more narrow wheel. As far as rubbing on the fenders, it will have more to do with diameter then wheel width. Now rubbing on the frame would be reduced on a wider wheel when comparing the same wheel back spacing.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2014 | 04:45 PM
  #7  
robsjeep9's Avatar
JK Junkie
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 3
From: Kitchener
Default

Ok thank you
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2014 | 09:01 PM
  #8  
CerOf's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by FullMetalJacket
I would like to hear some opinions on rims sizes. Specifically rim widths. I'm looking at getting 17" Method rim with a 4.5" backspacing. This particular rim available in 8",8.5" and 9" widths. I plan on running 35x12.5x17 tires. What are the pros and cons of any of these widths?
Be honest....how "hardcore" will you be? I run a 17x9 rim with 4.5" backspacing. (I think it is technically 4.6", but close enough, eh?) it is NOT a beadlock and I air down to 15psi. I've yet to lose a bead. My tires are 12" wide. (305/65R17 BFG M/T) the trails I run, for comparison are the ones in southwest colorado, Ouray area. Not overly difficult, 90%+ are doable stock. Some "optional" routes are not doable stock and require at least one locker or better. Unfortunately, I'm 90% pavement and 10% off.

They say a more narrow rim holds the bead better, but will make the center tread crown and wear faster. To combat this, you simply do the chalk test and run a bit less air pressure. No big deal unless you run heavy and/or tow and need air pressures high for said hauling endeavors.

Sent from some string and a few tin cans.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2014 | 05:18 AM
  #9  
GutlessPhred's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Lindon, Utah
Default

Originally Posted by FullMetalJacket
I would like to hear some opinions on rims sizes. Specifically rim widths. I'm looking at getting 17" Method rim with a 4.5" backspacing. This particular rim available in 8",8.5" and 9" widths. I plan on running 35x12.5x17 tires. What are the pros and cons of any of these widths?
What methods are you getting out of curiosity? I just found out I have to have a rim at least 8" to 11" for the tires I just bought. I was going to use my stock ones for awhile, but they are only 7.5. Discount won't mount them like that. Makes sense, but little frustrating for me the wheels aren't wide enough. You'd want to get the width recommended for your tire and if lifted whatever back spacing is recommended.

Sent from my iPhone using JK-Forum
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2014 | 06:07 AM
  #10  
jadmt's Avatar
JK Jedi
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 107
From: missoula,mt
Default

Originally Posted by GutlessPhred
What methods are you getting out of curiosity? I just found out I have to have a rim at least 8" to 11" for the tires I just bought. I was going to use my stock ones for awhile, but they are only 7.5. Discount won't mount them like that. Makes sense, but little frustrating for me the wheels aren't wide enough. You'd want to get the width recommended for your tire and if lifted whatever back spacing is recommended.

Sent from my iPhone using JK-Forum
Not sure if it matters but I scored 5 Raceline monsters from Discounttiredirect shipped for under $500 which was by far the best price on alloy rims and they are well made quality rims. might not be the greatest looking rim out there but I am going to beat them in the rocks anyway so price was nice.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 PM.