Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

RIPP Gen II Issues

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 06:55 PM
  #151  
JK-Rubi's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,386
Likes: 0
From: North Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by bubba_zenetti
^^^Who knows what secret sauce RIPP put in 3.3 but I can tell you this, for me, it made my rig run like poo. It had starting issues, did not idle well at times and just felt sluggish.
bubba, what's a typical barometric pressure measurement for you? I was reading 29.62 (in Hg) on the last data log run I collected. Also reached 9.6 psi of boost on that run - got up over 65 mph.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:02 PM
  #152  
Lotus F1's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 266
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by JAFHR
Ah, don't listen to Lotus F1. Since I put my SC on I've been getting an easy 2 mpg improvement. The power it takes to make HP on this SC is minimal. It's not a huge Roots style blower. If you can keep your foot out of it, you will get improved gas mileage.
Ok so let's go with this theory of "keeping your foot out of it". So now your car is essentially out of boost, still turning the belts and has the added weight of the charger system. How exactly is your car going to be more fuel efficient then a stock car and thus save you fuel.

You imply that having a Super Charger System saves you gas by having but NOT using it!?!? Ok this one has me baffled silly lol

Last edited by Lotus F1; Jan 10, 2012 at 07:08 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:08 PM
  #153  
JK-Rubi's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,386
Likes: 0
From: North Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Lotus F1
Ok so let's go with this theory of "keeping your foot out of it". So now your car is essentially out of boost, still turning the belts and has the added weight of the charger system. How exactly is your car going to be more fuel efficient then a stock car and thus save you fuel.

You imply that having a SC saves you gas by NOT using it!?!? Ok this one has me baffled lol
I made a similar observation in another thread.

Maybe we're over-thinking this.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:13 PM
  #154  
dusmmdb's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

Gents

What is the best way to address my RIPP supercharger issues??? I have sent a few PMs to them over the last week without a response. I just sent an email and hopefully that will get answered. I'm currently doing some training that doesnt allow me to make phone calls during regular working hours. I will be able to Friday and will try to call them then.

I had it installed last May and I had issues. I left shorty after that for Afghanistan and I recently returned.

I realize it is probably a programming issue but I am not the most "technical" guy when it comes to electronics. I understand they will address any issues, just seems like I cant establish comms with them!!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:18 PM
  #155  
Lotus F1's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 266
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

BTW turbocharging is a more effecient then supercharging. Turbos use the heat and expanding gases already present in your exhaust. Supercharged engines use belts on a pully. The only benefit to a supercharger is that it is tied to engine speed which is great for immediate predictable power. Where as a turbo will have some lag (although not much these days) with spool up.

In any case more power with these options means more air and thus more fuel. This is something you simply cannot get around with aftermarket forced induced recip engine kits. You can slice and dice it any way you like but the end result is you will not miraculously save more fuel.

Last edited by Lotus F1; Jan 10, 2012 at 07:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:50 PM
  #156  
JK_Oman's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 182
Likes: 1
From: Oman
Default

Originally Posted by SergeantChuck

Bubba, I'm learning hear so bear with me. Just installed my SC on Saturday. First time I have ever driven a jeep with a SC. What do we mean when we say "surge".

It may be my imagination but I think I feel a slight hesitation each time my JK tries to shift in the 2100rpm area. Like you said, all I need to do is mash the pledal a little more and she takes off. Is this what you are referring to or is it more of a raising and lowering of rpm type thing?

As for cruize control. Is the issue when your running around 65mph. I have not experienced an issue yet but I have not put many miles on this SC. I tried my cruize at 60mph. Seemed fine at that speed.
I'm interested to know too

Most issues are related to auto transmission right???
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:59 PM
  #157  
Lotus F1's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 266
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

That's sounds awefully like "lean tip in" as that supercharger starts to really pump air into the intake (2100rpms sounds about right) the car may momentarily go lean causing the hesitation. It is a common tuning consideration. I would personally never have forced induced vehicle without at minimum a airlfuel ratio meter (wide band even better) to see what's going on and to monitor.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 01:21 AM
  #158  
JAFHR's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Bend, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by bubba_zenetti
Maybe with a roots type system. A centrifugal supercharger does not eat that much power. Not enough to worry about. As a matter of fact, it probably robs the engine of less HP than your air conditioners compressor.

As far as MPGs go, if lets say your stock JK requires 50% throttle to cruise at 60MPH. Now lets say your RIPP equipped JK now takes 10% throttle to cruise at 60MPH. There my friend is where you gain MPGs. You are going to burn more fuel with the throttle open at 50% than having it open 10%

So I get 19MPG on the highway with 37s cruising at 60MPH. Stock it got 16.

Of course your mileage will vary

Keep in mind that MPGs have more to do with efficiency of the fuel burned rather than the amount of the fuel burned. If you make more efficient use out of the fuel pushing your brick with 4 wheels on it down the highway(this describes the aerodynamics of our JKs quite well), its going to get better fuel mileage than some motor that is struggling to push that brick through the wind.
I fully agree. Oh, and just because you are gaining more air pressure does not mean you're using more fuel. As for "keeping out of it". This means to me if you drive NORMALLY, not necessarily coasting for a 1/2 mile. I use up to 3/4 of full throttle and get better gas mileage. Where you will certainly notice the gas savings is on a long run of course.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 02:22 AM
  #159  
SergeantChuck's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: Cabot, AR
Default

Well after the install of the intial tune and about 40 miles of driving I took the BARO reading and sent the results back to Ripp. The BARO reading was 29.20

They sent back an updated 3.3 tune and now I have an engine light and she started a little rougher this morning than the past three days. Going to try to find out what code she is throwing later on today and get with Ripp so I can find out what is going on. Wish I could revert back to the original tune that was on the Predator but I'm sure it was probably replaced with the update.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 02:51 AM
  #160  
Jester116th's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Alliance, NE
Default

I'm so glad I got a 5.7vvt Hemi!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33 PM.