Specific Trackbar Question
#21
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
Thx, I will snap some pictures soon. In regard the the BJs, its been about 2years and I had both upper and lower replaced. I will research the brand in my extensive library of maintenance paperwork and post.
Possible for you to snap a couple pics of your front suspension? I'm not quite sure what you have installed here, cuz there really is no way to adjust camber on our JKs unless you installed offset BJs. How long ago did you replace BJs by the way, and what brand did you put in? Your left camber looks a bit low, although seeing 1* on the JK isn't uncommon. I only ask cuz typically low camber is a result of a worn BJ. I'm mainly wondering about this bracket you have installed.
Just to be overly clear about everything and make sure we're all on the same page here, here's what we're talking about in regards to caster....the rotation of the Cs on the axle -
Whereas camber is this -
Sltimmins has highlighted our caster correction options. If you do no or just light offroading (not playing in big boulders), most people will go with control arm brackets which are $100-$160 depending on which ones you buy. with a 2.5" lift, you can scoot by with just lower adjustable control arms. You could do uppers instead as noted, but the benefit of lowers vs. uppers is extending the wheelbase again while raising caster rather than just rotating the axle to raise caster.
Just to be overly clear about everything and make sure we're all on the same page here, here's what we're talking about in regards to caster....the rotation of the Cs on the axle -
Whereas camber is this -
Sltimmins has highlighted our caster correction options. If you do no or just light offroading (not playing in big boulders), most people will go with control arm brackets which are $100-$160 depending on which ones you buy. with a 2.5" lift, you can scoot by with just lower adjustable control arms. You could do uppers instead as noted, but the benefit of lowers vs. uppers is extending the wheelbase again while raising caster rather than just rotating the axle to raise caster.
#22
JK Jedi
Just to expand further on that camber and relation to ball joints -
Ignore the "positive camber" label as i forgot to erase that, and excuse my rough drawing of BJ's (red) and a knucle (blue) above.
The ball joints in the axle C are holding the knuckle, to which the unit bearing, brake rotor, and wheel are attached. The lower BJ is taking all of the load (except for Rare Parts), and the upper BJ is just helping hold position. When the BJ goes bad, it can no longer hold the C at the proper angle, and what you end up with is negative camber. You could also end up with negative caber if you bent the C on the axle with would result again in the knuckle sitting at an improper angle.
You may already be 100% clear on this stuff, but maybe someone will run across this in the future and benefit from it. Depending on what ball joints you previously replaced with this may or may not be relevant. Here is what the factory BJs have inside em -
Upper BJ on left, lower BJ on right. If one of those plastic tabs on the lower BJ break or crack, it's shot. When larger tires are added to the JK, you're putting a lot of additional stress on these things, and even one big jolt could doom em. If you replaced with something like an Alloy, Synergy, or other BJ 2 years ago, you're likely fine. If you replaced with factory, not certain you can eliminate them as an issue just cuz it was 2 years ago. That is why I asked about brand.
Ignore the "positive camber" label as i forgot to erase that, and excuse my rough drawing of BJ's (red) and a knucle (blue) above.
The ball joints in the axle C are holding the knuckle, to which the unit bearing, brake rotor, and wheel are attached. The lower BJ is taking all of the load (except for Rare Parts), and the upper BJ is just helping hold position. When the BJ goes bad, it can no longer hold the C at the proper angle, and what you end up with is negative camber. You could also end up with negative caber if you bent the C on the axle with would result again in the knuckle sitting at an improper angle.
You may already be 100% clear on this stuff, but maybe someone will run across this in the future and benefit from it. Depending on what ball joints you previously replaced with this may or may not be relevant. Here is what the factory BJs have inside em -
Upper BJ on left, lower BJ on right. If one of those plastic tabs on the lower BJ break or crack, it's shot. When larger tires are added to the JK, you're putting a lot of additional stress on these things, and even one big jolt could doom em. If you replaced with something like an Alloy, Synergy, or other BJ 2 years ago, you're likely fine. If you replaced with factory, not certain you can eliminate them as an issue just cuz it was 2 years ago. That is why I asked about brand.
#23
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
Great info here. Thank you. The BJ's I got are Moog. They are fully serviceable.
Just to expand further on that camber and relation to ball joints -
Ignore the "positive camber" label as i forgot to erase that, and excuse my rough drawing of BJ's (red) and a knucle (blue) above.
The ball joints in the axle C are holding the knuckle, to which the unit bearing, brake rotor, and wheel are attached. The lower BJ is taking all of the load (except for Rare Parts), and the upper BJ is just helping hold position. When the BJ goes bad, it can no longer hold the C at the proper angle, and what you end up with is negative camber. You could also end up with negative caber if you bent the C on the axle with would result again in the knuckle sitting at an improper angle.
You may already be 100% clear on this stuff, but maybe someone will run across this in the future and benefit from it. Depending on what ball joints you previously replaced with this may or may not be relevant. Here is what the factory BJs have inside em -
Upper BJ on left, lower BJ on right. If one of those plastic tabs on the lower BJ break or crack, it's shot. When larger tires are added to the JK, you're putting a lot of additional stress on these things, and even one big jolt could doom em. If you replaced with something like an Alloy, Synergy, or other BJ 2 years ago, you're likely fine. If you replaced with factory, not certain you can eliminate them as an issue just cuz it was 2 years ago. That is why I asked about brand.
Ignore the "positive camber" label as i forgot to erase that, and excuse my rough drawing of BJ's (red) and a knucle (blue) above.
The ball joints in the axle C are holding the knuckle, to which the unit bearing, brake rotor, and wheel are attached. The lower BJ is taking all of the load (except for Rare Parts), and the upper BJ is just helping hold position. When the BJ goes bad, it can no longer hold the C at the proper angle, and what you end up with is negative camber. You could also end up with negative caber if you bent the C on the axle with would result again in the knuckle sitting at an improper angle.
You may already be 100% clear on this stuff, but maybe someone will run across this in the future and benefit from it. Depending on what ball joints you previously replaced with this may or may not be relevant. Here is what the factory BJs have inside em -
Upper BJ on left, lower BJ on right. If one of those plastic tabs on the lower BJ break or crack, it's shot. When larger tires are added to the JK, you're putting a lot of additional stress on these things, and even one big jolt could doom em. If you replaced with something like an Alloy, Synergy, or other BJ 2 years ago, you're likely fine. If you replaced with factory, not certain you can eliminate them as an issue just cuz it was 2 years ago. That is why I asked about brand.
#24
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
I talked to mechanic and a couple of other guys and they all seem to think that the caster is not the culprit or too far out of line for a lifted Jeep. I'm not saying it isn't hurting but...
#25
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
Tires rotated, pads checked, bjs checked, last alignment diagnosed. The only discovery was a worn bushing on drivers side rear swaybar end link. Again, probably not the culprit but will report after I add two new ones.
#26
JK Enthusiast
I would put a set of Geometry Correction brackets on your Jeep.
Don't believe that's causing the pull, but it will fix the caster issue and make your JK much more fun to drive.
Don't believe that's causing the pull, but it will fix the caster issue and make your JK much more fun to drive.
#27
JK Super Freak
Thread Starter
#28
JK Jedi
The whole video has good information, but if you want to skip to the example, scoot forward to 3:10.
Now, my impression is you've had this jeep set up like this for a while, without any significant changes. Your caster didn't recently drop sharply. It sure isn't helping your issue is what I'm saying, but I have to think that it's at least some contributing factor. Even if it wasn't, sub 3* caster shouldn't be acceptable to any JK owner, and it's something you should seriously consider fixing. People chalk up a crappy driving jeep to "oh, it's just a lifted jeep and that is how it is", but that's not the case. I'm on 3.5" lift with 37s and can drive 80mph down the highway while taking my hands off the wheel. I wish that more people would have chimed in on this thread so it didn't seem like I'm the only one saying this, but I'd bet you would find that most people are going to side with me that sub 3* caster isn't correct.
#29
JK Jedi Master
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin <--> Colorado Springs
Posts: 11,465
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes
on
154 Posts
I only skimmed the thread so may have missed it, but which tires are you running? (A few have been reported to cause a pull to one side.) How old are they, and how often are they rotated?
Just looked at your profile. Mickey Thompson MTZ's. Haven't seen any posts relating these as the cause of a pull.
Last edited by nthinuf; 03-31-2019 at 11:12 AM.
#30
Even if it wasn't, sub 3* caster shouldn't be acceptable to any JK owner, and it's something you should seriously consider fixing. People chalk up a crappy driving jeep to "oh, it's just a lifted jeep and that is how it is", but that's not the case. I'm on 3.5" lift with 37s and can drive 80mph down the highway while taking my hands off the wheel. I wish that more people would have chimed in on this thread so it didn't seem like I'm the only one saying this, but I'd bet you would find that most people are going to side with me that sub 3* caster isn't correct.