Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Why 17" wheels over 18"?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 06:19 PM
  #1  
jdschup's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default Why 17" wheels over 18"?

I'm new to this whole Jeep customization thing, but noticing there seems to be a strong preference amongst off-roaders to use 17" wheels. I'm wondering why. My Sahara came with 18" wheels, probably because of improved ON road performance (?) which is kind of the intent of the Sahara model in general, I think. So, anyway, why 17" wheels?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 06:35 PM
  #2  
Ncb's Avatar
Ncb
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 2
From: Parker, Colorado
Default

Lighter, cheaper, less blingy, more D rated tire options in 17", more side wall and better when aired down.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 06:40 PM
  #3  
tjkamp's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 64
From: Sweet Home, TX
Default

Wheel size is really a preference, but there are advantages to going smaller. 17's have more options for ties sizes than 18. Also, with each size you go down the cheeper the tires, and wheels, get. As you go down in size you get a better tire sidewall to wheel ratio for more sidewall flex off road. There are downsides to going smaller, a lot of after market upgrades, especially brake upgrade packages are designed for a 17" or lager wheel, so going to 16" rules out some of those options. A lot of guys run 15" but you have to be careful because a lot of the after market 15" wheels won't fit on the JK.

From what I have seen 17" wheels are probably the most common choice for aftermarket wheels.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 07:15 PM
  #4  
nthinuf's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 165
From: Austin <--> Colorado Springs
Default

Originally Posted by jdschup
My Sahara came with 18" wheels, probably because of improved ON road performance (?) which is kind of the intent of the Sahara model in general, I think.
I think that 18's come with the 'upscale' Sahara for the bling factor, nothing to do with performance.

Kinda like all the people running around bragging about the looks of their new 20's or 22's. Congratulations, you just paid three times what I did just so you can show off... Good job!!
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 01:00 AM
  #5  
Mark Doiron's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
Veteran: Air Force
FJOTM Winner
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,800
Likes: 374
From: Midwest City, OK
Default

Originally Posted by nthinuf
I think that 18's come with the 'upscale' Sahara for the bling factor, nothing to do with performance. ...
I agree with this, especially when you consider that when the JK came out it was the Sahara model only that had painted fenders. The X/Sport is marketed for basic buyers (though it has a certain appeal to hardcore off-road modders who would replace all of the goodies out of a Rubicon), the Sahara is more for the "luxury" buyer (painted fenders, power options, 18" wheels, etc), and the Rubicon is more for the hardcore rock crawler (better axles, lower geared transfer case, lockers, etc). Those are broad generalizations and the explanations cited above regarding different wheel sizes are all correct. But, within the broader Jeep community, too little sidewall displays a lack of understanding of what a Jeep is really designed for. The closer your wheel is to the rocks (because of little sidewall), the rougher the ride, the less effectiveness the tires have to wrap around rocks and such, and the more vulnerable the wheels are to damage. Of course, that last one is a certain mark of pride for those of us who use our Jeeps, LOL.

Reply
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 06:11 AM
  #6  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

An 18" wheel will have a stiffer sidewall giving you an on road ride that firmer when cornering with reduced body roll. Its not a huge difference on a jeep. It also gives the manufactur another option to jack up the price.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 06:20 AM
  #7  
Lefty14's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Northern IL
Default

Originally Posted by nthinuf
I think that 18's come with the 'upscale' Sahara for the bling factor, nothing to do with performance.

Kinda like all the people running around bragging about the looks of their new 20's or 22's. Congratulations, you just paid three times what I did just so you can show off... Good job!!
+1
I bought the Sahara with the 18 inch polished wheels. When I looked for replacement tires (Bridgestones were terrible in the Northern Illinois winter), I found a lack of choices for tires in 18". So I bought a set of 17" takeoffs from the dealership. Put 285/70/17 Nitto Terra Grapplers on and never looked back! The ride does feel better with 17's also.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 07:39 AM
  #8  
jdschup's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

This is all really helpful, thanks everyone.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 10:35 AM
  #9  
jdschup's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

This is interesting:

Option 1: Purchase 5 - 325/65/R18 Duratracs to fit my current 18" wheels = $1,695. They are a calculated height of 34.6".*
Option 2: Purchase 5 - 315/70/R17 Duratracs to fit new 17" wheels = $1,430 ($265 less). They are a calculated height of 34.4".*

So, I'd lose .2", which is negligible for me, and I'd save $265. Granted, I'd have to buy 5 new 17" wheels so the actual cost would higher, but I'd also be selling 5 nearly new 18" aftermarket wheels with my current Duratracs with 80% tread life.

PLUS, the next time I need tires, I'd save money again since I'd be at the 17" wheel size instead of the 18" wheel size.



*I know there is some discussion about the "true" diameter of these tires, and I've found they are probably less than the diameters reported, but since I'm using the same website to get the diameter of both tires, I figured it apples to apples for the sake of my cost argument.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 10:56 AM
  #10  
Collyn's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 916
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by jdschup
This is interesting: Option 1: Purchase 5 - 325/65/R18 Duratracs to fit my current 18" wheels = $1,695. They are a calculated height of 34.6".* Option 2: Purchase 5 - 315/70/R17 Duratracs to fit new 17" wheels = $1,430 ($265 less). They are a calculated height of 34.4".* So, I'd lose .2", which is negligible for me, and I'd save $265. Granted, I'd have to buy 5 new 17" wheels so the actual cost would higher, but I'd also be selling 5 nearly new 18" aftermarket wheels with my current Duratracs with 80% tread life. PLUS, the next time I need tires, I'd save money again since I'd be at the 17" wheel size instead of the 18" wheel size. *I know there is some discussion about the "true" diameter of these tires, and I've found they are probably less than the diameters reported, but since I'm using the same website to get the diameter of both tires, I figured it apples to apples for the sake of my cost argument.
Or you can do as I did. Buy 5 off brand( but still really well made) 35x12.50-18's for $995.00.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 PM.