Notices
Sponsoring Manufacturers/Vendors - Check out Cyber Monday Specials!! New products, special offers, coupons, discounts and giveaways from sponsoring manufacturers and vendors of aftermarket products for the Jeep JK Wrangler Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X can be found on this forum

2012 JK RIPP Supercharger Sneak Peak - Worlds First Supercharged 3.6

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 07:42 PM
  #291  
NebraskaUnlimited's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Grand Island, NE
Default

Same here.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2013 | 12:23 AM
  #292  
Christarp's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 284
Likes: 2
From: Beaverton, Oregon
Default

He posted this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYejVqH8gG8
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2013 | 01:32 AM
  #293  
QUIKSILVERZ's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: lexington, ky
Default

would like to see a better test done to be honest. If he had 700 lbs extra in his first 0-60 test the 7.10 really is not that much slower than a 5.97 with the jeep setup light. It would be a fair comparo if the jeep was test with the extra 700 lbs again. Plus weather really affects performance. I was expecting a little better improvement.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2013 | 01:36 AM
  #294  
QUIKSILVERZ's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: lexington, ky
Default

Ripp

I saw your post on FB where a 2012, auto, 37s & 4.88 dynoed 348 rwhp. That is another 30 rwhp over the prior dyno chart showing 317 for a 2012, auto and 37s and gears. What changed with the setup? Was this a tune with more timing or leaner a/f ratio? A little more boost? Exhaust mods? etc.? Really considering your kit for my 2012 rubi with an auto trans. It def needs more power after lift, tires, armor, etc. Just wondering if you changed something in the setup for the kits coming out now. Thanks
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2013 | 11:46 AM
  #295  
Space Monkey's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Coquitlam, BC
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKSILVERZ
would like to see a better test done to be honest. If he had 700 lbs extra in his first 0-60 test the 7.10 really is not that much slower than a 5.97 with the jeep setup light. It would be a fair comparo if the jeep was test with the extra 700 lbs again. Plus weather really affects performance. I was expecting a little better improvement.

Not only was the one at 7.1 a little embarrassing, it gets beat by a stock auto Rubi as Motor Trend has the stock JK auto at 6.7s to 60. TBH though, to me its not about how fast i can make the jeep go, it about when the power kicks in and i can make it over an obstical instead of stalling out or not having the momentum to keep going.

Space
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2013 | 01:18 PM
  #296  
dozerjk12's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: long island new york
Default

Call it a truck one more freakin time!!!!!!!! lol
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2013 | 03:36 AM
  #297  
hosspala's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Belmont, NC
Default

Being from the drag race world I understand the 0-60 world. It's takes a lot to drop nearly a second off your time!

Congrats in it, I can't wait to do this to mine. Gotta get it out of the dealership first. It's getting a new head for that stupid ticking noise. Thought I'd handle it before I ruined my warranty with a super charger
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 10:18 AM
  #298  
RIPPMODS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sponsoring Manufacturer
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 2
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKSILVERZ
Ripp

I saw your post on FB where a 2012, auto, 37s & 4.88 dynoed 348 rwhp. That is another 30 rwhp over the prior dyno chart showing 317 for a 2012, auto and 37s and gears. What changed with the setup? Was this a tune with more timing or leaner a/f ratio? A little more boost? Exhaust mods? etc.? Really considering your kit for my 2012 rubi with an auto trans. It def needs more power after lift, tires, armor, etc. Just wondering if you changed something in the setup for the kits coming out now. Thanks
Lots of dyno time and tune adjustments. All previous owners have access to all our newest tunes. It is still BETA, but we feel the latest tunes that we have been testing are excellent and ready for mainstream consumption...
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 01:12 PM
  #299  
QUIKSILVERZ's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: lexington, ky
Default

Originally Posted by RIPPMODS
Lots of dyno time and tune adjustments. All previous owners have access to all our newest tunes. It is still BETA, but we feel the latest tunes that we have been testing are excellent and ready for mainstream consumption...
cool i saw your answer to me on facebook also. Will buyers have an option for the 93 octane tune? Everywhere in KY around me has 93 octane. Plus i am using to paying for 93 octane since i have diablosport tune in my jeep already and my last two cars have been tuned for 93. i am a gearhead and use to fast cars so of course i like the higher rear wheels numbers lol. Thanks for your response.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #300  
RIPPMODS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sponsoring Manufacturer
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 2
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKSILVERZ
cool i saw your answer to me on facebook also. Will buyers have an option for the 93 octane tune? Everywhere in KY around me has 93 octane. Plus i am using to paying for 93 octane since i have diablosport tune in my jeep already and my last two cars have been tuned for 93. i am a gearhead and use to fast cars so of course i like the higher rear wheels numbers lol. Thanks for your response.
It is tuned to operate safely on 89 octane though 91/93 is recommended for best performance.

RIPP
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:43 AM.