JK-Forum.com - The top destination for Jeep JK and JL Wrangler news, rumors, and discussion

JK-Forum.com - The top destination for Jeep JK and JL Wrangler news, rumors, and discussion (https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/)
-   Stock JK Tech (https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/stock-jk-tech-12/)
-   -   2014 rubicon (https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/stock-jk-tech-12/2014-rubicon-287256/)

RubicAn11 Oct 1, 2013 09:32 PM

2014 rubicon
 
Looking to get a new Rubicon. Wife wants a automatic with navigation, anything I should know before making the deal with the devil. Any info is appreciated.

Tripletsi Oct 1, 2013 11:14 PM

Select the 4.10 gears when buying. Most Rubicon's come with 3.73's now, the 4.10's will let you run up to 35" tires without forking out $1500-2000 for a re-gear!

Also buy every option now, that way you won't want it later and have any regrets. It'll only hurt once!

lkinmond Oct 1, 2013 11:19 PM

Don't waste money on factory nav - the unit sucks. You'll get much more out of aftermarket units or even google maps on a smartphone. I'd say the same about any of the stereo units as well...I payed extra for the "upgrade" and it was crap - I ended up putting in aftermarket speakers/head unit for less than the price I payed for the upgrade...lesson learned!

SabrToothSqrl Oct 2, 2013 05:23 AM

nav
 
the OEM nav works fine for me.

I have a 2012 Rubi and love it :)

oriffx Oct 2, 2013 05:27 AM

I've had no problem with the nav. I have a 2012 Rubi. It's basically an inbuilt Garmin.

lkinmond Oct 2, 2013 06:05 AM


Originally Posted by oriffx (Post 3694125)
I've had no problem with the nav. I have a 2012 Rubi. It's basically an inbuilt Garmin.

Fair enough - to each his own. I just prefer all of the points of interest, restaurant reviews, free traffic updates, slicker more responsive touchscreen etc. that a smartphone nav offers. I couldn't stand it on the OEM...it felt like a Garmin from 5 years ago, Not to mention it costs $1,000 or even $1800 depending on which one you choose. That's the insane part - If it's basically a Garmin (as others have outlined), then buy a top of the line Garmin for a few hundred bucks...haha - Spend the other $1500 on upgrades :) Again, just my POV

RubicAn11 Oct 2, 2013 12:17 PM

This is the info I was looking for. The two I'm checking out do have the 4:10 gears not 3:73 like other ones. Thanks for the input.

Crushcrush11 Oct 2, 2013 01:43 PM

I have a 2012 with the 3.73 and run duratrac's without any issues. I have ran them for sometime without the Procal. The Procal is needed for shifting and speedo with the tire. I don't think the 4.10 is needed for a 35" tire. I wheel and use every day and still get 18-20 with lift bumpers and rock rails.

kh202 Oct 2, 2013 01:51 PM


Originally Posted by Crushcrush11 (Post 3694504)
I have a 2012 with the 3.73 and run duratrac's without any issues. I have ran them for sometime without the Procal. The Procal is needed for shifting and speedo with the tire. I don't think the 4.10 is needed for a 35" tire. I wheel and use every day and still get 18-20 with lift bumpers and rock rails.

It's not 100% needed, I'm running 3.21's but 4.10 will perform better than 3.73. Since he has option may as well get what's ideal :thumbsup:

RubicAn11 Oct 2, 2013 09:19 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Well... Money is power and my old lady has both. We came to an agreement on this.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands