Notices
Stock JK Tech Bulletin board forum regarding issues with OE (original equipment) components of the Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) such as factory suspension parts, engine, transmission, body parts, interior fixtures and the on-board computer.

Low on oil

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 8, 2013 | 08:24 PM
  #21  
snytribe's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Grove, Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by LOST
Oddly enough my 2 dr JK just started consuming oil like mad at 49,000 miles. Is this the magic milage where they start consuming oil or what?

Got the same lame duck "oh it's just your PCV valve" story from the dealer. I don't buy it.

Starting thier official oil consumption test today.

They want me to wait until 1,000 miles to bring it back. I'm afriad I'l just about run dry by then.
Been adding a full quart per gas tank, about every 200 miles. By 1,000 miles it could be 5 quarts low, only holds 6 right?

Have you seen any change in your oil level yet?
Where did it start, above the hump in the dipstick?

I ask because I've heard some dealers will overfill the oil during these consumption tests so it shows normal (within hatch marks) after 1,000 miles and deny your claim.

Not trying to hi jack your thread, just curious what your experience with this oil consumption test has been like so far.
No problem about the hi jack. Lets keep each other and anyone else in our shoes up to date about all this.

I have replaced the PCV valve myself... This did not help.

I did check and the dipstick when I picked t up and it was right at the full level.

They have me coming back in 500 miles. If it is low before that I'm supposed to take it in and let them check the oil level. I plan on checking it often. I do not want it to run low, it is still my engine.

Not sure why a dealer would try to fight this since they will make money if something needs repaired.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2013 | 05:56 AM
  #22  
Ryan0260's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,054
Likes: 85
From: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by snytribe
Thanks, I will check out my self. I changed the PCV valve myself. It did not seem to make a difference. They told me 1gt/1000 miles is acceptable. Is this right?
Well this is what Chrysler says. IMO, 1 qt per 1k is horribly unacceptable. It leaves them a big window to cover up sloppy building, tolerances, and quality control...
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2013 | 07:21 AM
  #23  
ronjenx's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,907
Likes: 185
From: Maine
Default

Ford, Chevy, Honda, etc., all have their oil burners. They all have similar oil burning limits before they will respond under warranty.

The difference now is we are all on forums where we see a concentration of oil burning posts. Most owners, on forums or not, don't complain or post about their vehicles that don't burn oil.

I've never had a vehicle in the past that burned oil. I knew some did, but had no way to judge how many outside my own circle of friends, (whose cars also didn't burn oil).

I'd like to see some statistics that would show how the JK compares to all the other brands out there.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2013 | 08:18 AM
  #24  
snytribe's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Grove, Illinois
Default

I agree with your comment that all makes have pull burners. Why not fox the problem? One qt pre 1000 miles is not right.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2013 | 08:29 AM
  #25  
ronjenx's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,907
Likes: 185
From: Maine
Default

Originally Posted by snytribe
I agree with your comment that all makes have pull burners. Why not fox the problem? One qt pre 1000 miles is not right.
It's a direct result of mass production. They can't all be good. So there is a threshold for rejection.

The only real way to improve the numbers it to hand make and hand assemble the engines.
We can't afford that, and there would be a decades-long waiting list for them. (That has been the case in some countries even for really crappy cars.)
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2013 | 09:10 AM
  #26  
Ryan0260's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,054
Likes: 85
From: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by ronjenx

It's a direct result of mass production. They can't all be good. So there is a threshold for rejection.

The only real way to improve the numbers it to hand make and hand assemble the engines.
We can't afford that, and there would be a decades-long waiting list for them. (That has been the case in some countries even for really crappy cars.)
This is true, and why they leave such a high consumption tolerance. Some will leave the factory tight, and some will be sloppy..
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2013 | 05:43 PM
  #27  
snytribe's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Grove, Illinois
Default

I understand not all are going to be perfect. I still question why they do not take care of the ones that are not. If nothing more then to get people coming back the next time they buy a car. If I purchase something that does not work like I think it should and the company will not back that product I will not shop there again. I have not abused this vehicle. I have taken very good care of my jeep. This is not caused by abuse. I see that you have been a jeep person for a long time and know way more about jeeps then I do, but again no way should 1qt per 1000 mile be acceptable.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2013 | 05:46 PM
  #28  
Lucas718's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 346
Likes: 2
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

The next time they give you the 1 qt per 1000 miles is normal, run this piece of logic by them:

The 3.8L V6 engine holds 6 quarts of oil.
The owners manual recommends changing oil at 6000 miles.

It would be empty by then. How is that normal? How well is it going to run with no oil in it?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2013 | 08:29 PM
  #29  
snytribe's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Grove, Illinois
Default

Great comment, I might have to try that. Though even the service manager thinks 1qt per 1000 miles is ridiculous. Will have to see how much I'm actually burning and if they stand behind their product.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2013 | 08:40 PM
  #30  
ronjenx's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,907
Likes: 185
From: Maine
Default

Originally Posted by Lucas718
The next time they give you the 1 qt per 1000 miles is normal, run this piece of logic by them:

The 3.8L V6 engine holds 6 quarts of oil.
The owners manual recommends changing oil at 6000 miles.

It would be empty by then. How is that normal? How well is it going to run with no oil in it?
How could it be empty by then when the oil level should be checked periodically? (At each gas stop or two)
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:37 PM.