Notices
JK Show & Tell Whether they're just poser shots in your driveway or hardcore action shots on the trail, if you've got photos or videos of your Jeep JK Wrangler (or any JK for that matter that you think is worth showing off, inside or out), we want to see them so please post them here! Likewise, if you are wanting to see a photo of something specific like an aftermarket JK part or poser shot with a specific setup, this is the place to ask for it.

Mr. T's boring but functional build

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-15-2014, 04:56 PM
  #1  
JK Junkie
FJOTM Winner
Thread Starter
 
Mr.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Over the hill
Posts: 2,158
Received 202 Likes on 184 Posts
Default The boring build -- 33s and 2" lift


Everyone's Jeep is a personal compromise between many competing choices and a budget, and this is no exception. The goal was to add a just little more rubber, add a little more ride height, add a bit more suspension down travel, and keep almost everything else boringly stock. The start point was an almost new 2008 Rubi JK. Bottom line is ~2.5" more belly clearance, ~0.5" more axle clearance, ~1" greater suspension travel, wider tire contact patch, better winter tire performance, and better skid protection. Despite the changes, highway MPG has stayed unchanged at ~19 during summer.

Lift: OME (Old Man Emu) 2" springs. 2615 in front & 2617 in the rear. These are not the "heavy springs". I've seen retailers refer to them as "Light" or "Medium". In the OME catalog, the lift height is rated for 50mm (Aussie 2") with a "bull bar" (Aussie heavy front bumper) on the 2615 front springs, and up to 150 Kg constant additional weight on the 2617 rear springs. The front spring rate is 120 lb/inch (same as stock) and the rear is 160 lb/inch (stiffer than stock). OME 10mm trim spacers above the springs were also added. Measured lift with bumpers, skids, tools, recovery gear, etc. is 2". With all weight on diagonal tires (axle's crossed and sway-bar disconnected), it's at the stock bump stops. This is an ideal spring rate for me, all the potential travel is being used during slow crawling, and it rides well on the street too.
Click image for larger version

Name:	EchoCanyon11.jpg
Views:	1830
Size:	100.3 KB
ID:	571342
Side note: No caster correction (control arms, cam colts, or drop brackets) was necessary. On a good highway, hands off the wheel, it will stay in a lane for a 5 to 10 seconds -- The steering is not flighty at any speed. And because of the relatively small changes (in lift, tire size, suspension down travel), there also wasn't any need to change driveshafts, brake lines, bump stops, or add track bar relocation brackets, etc. The stock steering stabilizer works fine for me as well, even in the stock location -- The bracket for 2008 is slightly higher than the later years, and the bottom of the stab sits even with the bottom of the tie rod.

Shocks: OME Nitrocharger Sport shocks; 60066 in front and 60067 in the rear. The extended lengths are 580mm / 22.83" (front) 619mm / 24.37" (rear) -- 1.1" longer than than standard Rubi shocks. The greater down travel centers the suspension travel (between full shock extension and the bump stop) with a 2" lift. Total front travel is 7" + bump stop compression and rear travel is 8-1/2" + bump stop compression. The collapsed length is shorter than stock Rubi shocks, so no issues with keeping the stock bump stops. OME designed the shock length to use stock brake lines, but in my case the rears were slightly taught at full extension -- Bending each rear hard line above the flexible line using a hand tubing bender a few degrees solved the issue. The CV joints still looked good at full down-travel, but not a lot of angularity left. The wiring ties for the e-Lockers and the axle breather tubes required adjustment to maintain slack at full droop as well.

Track Bars and Sway Links: Track bars such as from JKS and Teraflex are stiffer (especially the front), and handling is improved. Teraflex has a video of the stock trackbar flexing while moving the steering wheel. Unfortunately, the JKS front Track bar occasionally hit the front diff cover when the stock bump stops got compressed enough, so it was replaced by a Teraflex TER1753418 that has the same clearance as stock. Both the TER front & JKS rear are set to within 1/8" of stock length, measure centered, and nothing hits during suspension travel.

Rear sway links can be used on the front, but I used JKS links. The rear links are longer, and using them on the front sway bar keeps them from going over-center at full droop (because the new shocks have more down travel). To get the desired length on the JKS sway links, running a die to extend the threads was necessary to get them short enough.

Note on JKS swaybar links: If the swaybar lengths are too long they will hit stuff -- including the wheels. If they are too short, they can go over-center at full droop and bend stuff. Both front and rear lengths were set to a bit longer than the stock rear links (Rubicon model with the stock E-Disco unit). Blue locktite was used on the swaybar bolts to make sure they don't get loose. The JKS links pivot in a socket rather than flex rubber bushings..

Tires: With stock wheels and no wheel-spacers, hopefully the wear and tear on parts like ball joints (which are tested here) is going to be about the same as stock as long as the tires are not too much heavier.
Click image for larger version

Name:	SteeringStop.jpg
Views:	2033
Size:	62.0 KB
ID:	571340
And if a washer is added to the steering stops (see pic above) to reduce the max steering angle, tires with about 33" diameter and 9" tread width (~11" section width using 7.5" wide rims) will have clearance at full articulation - especially with a lift since the bump stops will get less compression due to the extra spring force. The "Mountain Snowflake" tire rating is my preference given the weather and the traction tire/chain laws here -- which limits the selection considerably. LT285/70-17 Goodyear AT Adventure was the choice.

These tires only weigh 6 pounds more than the original BFG KM's, are a little less than 1" taller, and the tread is about 1" wider. Despite being load range E, with ~4 psi less they feel the same as load range C KM's. Off-road is the same story, just a bit less air to get the desired cush. For some pics of tread & sidewall flexing plus the tire foot-print at different pressures, see this thread. To keep the spare tire from contacting/bending the third brake light, a 3/16" generic wheel spacer was added between the wheel and spare tire mount.
Click image for larger version

Name:	RockTread11.jpg
Views:	1161
Size:	63.6 KB
ID:	578671
Note on setting tire size: Changing tire diameter requires setting the tire size parameter in the PCM (Powertrain Control Module) for accurate speedometer, odometer, ESP, etc. The dealer can do it, but purchasing a device like the AEV ProCal or an Aeroforce Scan Gauge is more convenient. The tire diameter on manufacturer's or retailer's web sites is the diameter with NO WEIGHT on the axle. The diameter or circumference entered into the Jeep's PCM is the "rolling diameter", which is the effective diameter with the vehicle weight on the axle. Measuring from the ground to the center of the wheel and multiplying by 2 is a quick way to get the approximate rolling diameter. The tire tread flattens as it contacts the road, and how much it flattens depends on tire pressure and weight. The flatter the tire gets, the less distance the Jeep goes for each revolution. In the case of the AEV Procal, this diameter is entered to the nearest 0.25", and for the Aeroforce Scan Gauge it's entered in millimeters circumference. 25.4 millimeters to the inch, and the circumference is 3.1416 times the diameter. After testing with mile markers on the highway, the most accurate setting for these LT-285/70-17 tires was 2540 millimeters circumference using the Aeroforce, and 32" would be the closest setting on the Procal.

Bumpers & Skids: Rugged Ridge XHD, front and rear. The rear bumper was modified with a power hack-saw for a bit more clearance behind the rear wheels. The approach and departure angles are better than stock, but too bad these are not available in aluminum for the weight savings. I made a nut-plate and added an extra bolt to beef up the rear drivers side bumper frame mount, similar to how the passenger side was designed. A Superwinch Talon 9.5 is up front, with synthetic rope to reduce weight (67 lbs total). Here's a write-up I did about adding a safety circuit breaker to protect the winch/wiring. Removed the lighter Rubi rock rails and replaced with Poison Spyder rocker knockers. Added a MORE evap skid and Mopar diff cover skid plates.

I started out with Pure Jeep engine + T-Case skids. But similar to the JKS front track bar occasionally rubbing the diff cover, the front support for the engine skid occasionally rubbed the diff when bump stops compressed. Now it has a Rancho oil pan skid, and a Rubicon Express T-Case skid that extends forward a few inches to protect the exhaust crossover and the cross-member. There was significant clearance gained in the change. Although much of the manual trans is now unprotected, it sits relatively high and isn't delicate.

Lastly, I welded on Synergy front & PureJeep rear LCA skids. There's only a tiny decrease in ground clearance, <1/8" at the lowest point.




Click image for larger version

Name:	_20150503_132628s.jpg
Views:	806
Size:	72.0 KB
ID:	609520
Front bumper view. The shackles on either the front or rear bumper can be used for lifting, or pulling. The license plate has a removable mounting plate that covers up the fairlead.

Click image for larger version

Name:	_20150502_152654s.jpg
Views:	772
Size:	46.3 KB
ID:	609521
Rear bumper view -- Modified with some minor saw cuts in the area just behind the tires for a bit less weight and more clearance. I wish this picture showed how steep that down-hill stretch was...


Last edited by Mr.T; 02-24-2022 at 08:32 AM. Reason: Fixed colors & formatting - Updated with latest mods...
The following users liked this post:
WestAusJeep (09-18-2022)
Old 08-15-2014, 04:58 PM
  #2  
JK Junkie
FJOTM Winner
Thread Starter
 
Mr.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Over the hill
Posts: 2,158
Received 202 Likes on 184 Posts
Default More pics that didn't fit in the first post...

Click image for larger version

Name:	insul-liner.jpg
Views:	966
Size:	9.3 KB
ID:	571345
Insul-Liners installed on the roof interior. They made a huge difference in extreme temperatures.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Waterfall 2.jpg
Views:	1036
Size:	97.9 KB
ID:	571346
Before the 285/70 tires - Even 32's worked pretty well! The RR XHD rear bumper is tapered for better departure angle -- This pic is before a couple saw cuts on each side that added a bit of additional clearance to the area behind the tires. The PS rock sliders sit very high, bolting to the pinch seam and under-body.

Click image for larger version

Name:	SnowRoad1.jpg
Views:	960
Size:	56.1 KB
ID:	571347
Hard packed snow + ice, fun as long as there's some traction.

Click image for larger version

Name:	CrossedAxles.jpg
Views:	1192
Size:	81.5 KB
ID:	571348
Extra fuel is in Rotopax containers with custom covers mounted to either side of the spare, and a Trasharoo on the back. The Rotopax tire mount is an EZ-rack basic from Rockslide Engineering.

Click image for larger version

Name:	SteelCamping.jpg
Views:	1032
Size:	97.5 KB
ID:	571350
Just enough room for camping equipment for two and some tools/recovery gear. Extra water carried in Rotpax containers behind the front seats on the floor.

Last edited by Mr.T; 05-14-2015 at 08:45 PM.
Old 08-16-2014, 07:02 PM
  #3  
JK Junkie
FJOTM Winner
Thread Starter
 
Mr.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Over the hill
Posts: 2,158
Received 202 Likes on 184 Posts
Default Continued - Reference material

Here's a few helpful docs.

Old Man Emu (OME) application guide -- Includes specs like extended and compressed shock lengths, spring rates, spring height, etc.


This PDF was reportedly from Discount Tire, but that's not where I found it. The instructions are inside. The beauty is that all one needs is the Load Index and Load Range for the original tire and the replacement tire, plus the original tire PSI, to estimate the replacement tire PSI.
Tire inflation.pdf
For instance, the original equipment BFG KM in 255/75-17 has a Load Index of 111, Load Range C, and door sticker of 37 PSI. Using the Table, a Load Index 121, Load Range E replacement tire (typical 285/70-17 tire) would be equivalent to the original at ~35 PSI. Both the Load Index and Load Range are on the side of the tire, or look it up online.


This pic has a diagram for measuring lift height.
Click image for larger version

Name:	LiftHeight.jpg
Views:	872
Size:	46.3 KB
ID:	571618

Last edited by Mr.T; 12-02-2014 at 06:46 PM.
Old 09-06-2014, 07:08 PM
  #4  
JK Junkie
FJOTM Winner
Thread Starter
 
Mr.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Over the hill
Posts: 2,158
Received 202 Likes on 184 Posts
Default Continued - Skid installation

Updated spring of 2016: Removed Pure Jeep engine and transfer case skids because the engine skid front support occasionally rubbed the diff during bump stop compression. Added Rancho ROSRS6208 oil pan skid, and Rubicon Express RUBREA1014 transfer case skid. The change also gained 2-4 inches of clearance in the area of the engine oil pan & transmission. The manual trans is now more vulnerable, but it sits relatively high and isn't that delicate.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Tcase Skid side view.jpg
Views:	397
Size:	64.4 KB
ID:	646867
The front of the T-Case skid extends to protect the exhaust crossover, the cross member, and it's form also lends protection to the heads of the bolts in the cross member. This is where the old skid setup had some good use, and it was hard to find a T-case skid that had this coverage.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Tcase Skid Front.jpg
Views:	393
Size:	64.2 KB
ID:	646866
The mounting hole on the fuel tank side is recessed, and the bolt on the other side uses a thick tapered washer to protect the bolt.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Oilpan Skid front.jpg
Views:	363
Size:	59.0 KB
ID:	646864
The Rancho oil pan skid is held on primarily by high temp silicone (included), but there is also a tab on the front that uses one oil pan screw. It fits snug on all sides.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Oilpan Skid rear.jpg
Views:	381
Size:	62.4 KB
ID:	646865
The old skid had some minor rock-rash in the oil pan area, but it sat around 2 inches lower so contact with earth should be less likely now...

Sep 2016 update: Welded Synergy front LCA skids on.
Click image for larger version

Name:	LCA Skid Welding.jpg
Views:	428
Size:	56.9 KB
ID:	657616

Last edited by Mr.T; 09-27-2016 at 05:08 PM. Reason: Updated with latest mods...
Old 09-07-2014, 04:14 PM
  #5  
JK Newbie
 
wheels777's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you have any more pictures of the insul-liners? I've been thinking about some for mine.

Nice looking jeep man!!
Old 09-07-2014, 06:15 PM
  #6  
JK Junkie
FJOTM Winner
Thread Starter
 
Mr.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Over the hill
Posts: 2,158
Received 202 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wheels777
Do you have any more pictures of the insul-liners? I've been thinking about some for mine.

Nice looking jeep man!!
Thanks, the wife and I really enjoy this machine. Everyone will tell you that the insul-liners are on the expensive side, but the quality is super and the jeep feels way cooler on those 100+ days. No other pics on disk, but if there's something in particular you want a look at I'll take a quick pic. Also, the install video has a lot of views.

Old 12-04-2014, 02:10 PM
  #7  
JK Junkie
FJOTM Winner
Thread Starter
 
Mr.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Over the hill
Posts: 2,158
Received 202 Likes on 184 Posts
Default New OME "Sport" shocks

Several weeks ago I replaced replaced OME (Old Man Emu) Nitrocharger N196 (front) and N198 (rear) shocks with the OME "Sport" version, part numbers 60066 and 60067 receptively.

Here's how I'd rate the difference on my Jeep...

Paved roads and highways: The Sport shocks are firmer, more toward a sports car type of shock. Less brake dive, less body roll. Pot holes and speed bumps feel the same. My wife likes to read books when she's a passenger, but also has a slight tendency to get motion sickness (car sick). Without a doubt, she prefers the Sports.

Dirt roads and washboard: The Sports feel more in control as speed increases, no difference at slower speeds.

Rocks and ledges: The Sports seem firmer coming down off a rock or ledge -- Less suspension travel on compression, and less "wallow" as it settles.


Last edited by Mr.T; 12-04-2014 at 07:28 PM.
The following users liked this post:
WestAusJeep (09-18-2022)
Old 12-07-2014, 05:04 AM
  #8  
JK Super Freak
 
dmwil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Danville, Indiana
Posts: 1,448
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Nice job with this!

I went with an AEV 2" spacer lift and kept the Rubi shocks. I then went with 255/80/17 (33") BFG KM2's on the stock wheels. Overall, the ride improved slightly, while clearance off road was significantly improved, especially the break-over angle.

My goal wasn't a Moab rock monster, but to retain road manners while improving trail performance. I also did not want to increase wear and tear on suspension components by adding a bunch of weight. With that in mind, I went stuck with the stock bumpers and added a winch plate and winch with synthetic rope, again for light weight. I want this Jeep to go 300k miles without major issues.

I added an oil pan skid plate and evap canister skid. I may yet add the Mopar diff covers, at some point.

Off-road, I've had the axles crossed to the max at full turn, sway bar disconnected, and the only issue was an annoying slight rub on the plastic air dam, which could be fixed with a little trimming. The suspension performed as it should, with no weird noises or anything. I'm not sure what is thought of spacer lifts, but the AEV does just fine, as AEV told me it would over the phone when I called them and asked about it.

For me, moderation is the philosophy of life, whether with Jeeps, alcohol, or whatever.

Nice write up and awesome Jeep!
Old 12-07-2014, 12:09 PM
  #9  
JK Junkie
FJOTM Winner
Thread Starter
 
Mr.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Over the hill
Posts: 2,158
Received 202 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Thanks! I like the way you set up yours as well, very similar. Yep, moderation is way under-rated...

Old 12-07-2014, 01:03 PM
  #10  
ade
JK Enthusiast
 
ade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr.T
Several weeks ago I replaced replaced OME (Old Man Emu) Nitrocharger N196 (front) and N198 (rear) shocks with the OME "Sport" version, part numbers 60066 and 60067 receptively.

Here's how I'd rate the difference on my Jeep...

Paved roads and highways: The Sport shocks are firmer, more toward a sports car type of shock. Less brake dive, less body roll. Pot holes and speed bumps feel the same. My wife likes to read books when she's a passenger, but also has a slight tendency to get motion sickness (car sick). Without a doubt, she prefers the Sports.

Dirt roads and washboard: The Sports feel more in control as speed increases, no difference at slower speeds.

Rocks and ledges: The Sports seem firmer coming down off a rock or ledge -- Less suspension travel on compression, and less "wallow" as it settles.

Nice looking 2 door sir. I am running the same OME shocks at the moment and was looking to change them in the new year. Will take your findings into consideration when researching my replacements.


Quick Reply: Mr. T's boring but functional build



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 AM.