Pros and Cons of Independent suspension
But I still think it would be a good option and it would open up the buying field even more and put more jeeps on the road
Because IFS can't articulate. Articulation is very important when on uneven terrain--it's what keeps you from rolling over because you ended up balanced on two tires instead of four, or briefly three, in contact with very uneven terrain.
Watch. The only thing that saves this Hummer is he's super wide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgYcnJnsc7k Now watch the Jeep. Articulation: It keeps you safe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmclIQuqDgo
Watch. The only thing that saves this Hummer is he's super wide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgYcnJnsc7k Now watch the Jeep. Articulation: It keeps you safe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmclIQuqDgo
Because IFS can't articulate. Articulation is very important when on uneven terrain--it's what keeps you from rolling over because you ended up balanced on two tires instead of four, or briefly three, in contact with very uneven terrain.
Watch. The only thing that saves this Hummer is he's super wide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgYcnJnsc7k Now watch the Jeep. Articulation: It keeps you safe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmclIQuqDgo
Watch. The only thing that saves this Hummer is he's super wide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgYcnJnsc7k Now watch the Jeep. Articulation: It keeps you safe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmclIQuqDgo
Brenthel Industries designed an IFS conversion for a company that went out of business. Might want to contact them but it wasnt cheap, required a 10" wider WMS to WMS set up and was only a single coilover up front (cant run a bypass and coilover).
Because IFS can't articulate. Articulation is very important when on uneven terrain--it's what keeps you from rolling over because you ended up balanced on two tires instead of four, or briefly three, in contact with very uneven terrain.
Watch. The only thing that saves this Hummer is he's super wide.
Watch. The only thing that saves this Hummer is he's super wide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrbmsqSJcz8
Yes, call me guilty of selecting a dramatic comparison. Here's a Tacoma ...
YouTube Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrbmsqSJcz8
YouTube Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrbmsqSJcz8
Ramp Travel Indexes tests for various stock vehicles:
1991 Honda civic hatch back (factory stock): 319 - (just for a refference point)
1997 Jeep Wrangler (factory stock): 607
2002 Jeep Cherokee (factory stock): 575 (approximate)
2007 Toyota FJ cruiser (factory stock): 491
Although the FJC’s RTI numbers put it in second last place out of the four listed, we have to remember that it has IFS and the two Jeeps were designed with stock axles. That being said, 491 is pretty respectable for a vehicle with IFS. You probably wont see too many stock IFS SUVs that will score higher than this.
However the really depressing thing for the diehard FJ cruiser fans is when you compare it to the 2007 Wrangler’s RTI figures:
Driving right off the dealer’s lot the 2007 wrangler will give an RTI of 652 (with the sway bar). If you hit the sway bar disconnect button on the dash, it will pull a whopping 832 RTI! This is on a completely stock Jeep!








