Rubicon vs. Sahara
JK Freak
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 592
Likes: 6
From: Auburn, Alabama
There are so many threads on this. 
Use the search function.
Rubicon = better resale value and more trail capable from the factory.
Sahara = better value, especially if you're going to make a real trail rig (which means replacing all of the Rubicon extras with stuff that's even better).
If I could do it all over again, I would get an Unlimited X with the convenience group (I think it's called that). Then I'd take the money I saved and build something much better than a Rubicon.
-Dawn
Use the search function.Rubicon = better resale value and more trail capable from the factory.
Sahara = better value, especially if you're going to make a real trail rig (which means replacing all of the Rubicon extras with stuff that's even better).
If I could do it all over again, I would get an Unlimited X with the convenience group (I think it's called that). Then I'd take the money I saved and build something much better than a Rubicon.
-Dawn
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Ok I was wondering...couldn't exactly find a topic that plainly told me what I was looking for (but you did).
Thanks much
As far as adding the lifts and such, do all models chassis handle it pretty much the same way?
Thanks much
As far as adding the lifts and such, do all models chassis handle it pretty much the same way?
JK Jedi
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,798
Likes: 0
From: ....
Originally Posted by OnBelay
...especially if you're going to make a real trail rig....
IMHO, it really depends on what you want to wheel, where you want your rig build to end up and how long it you think it will take you to save the funds to get there. I love my Rubi and bought it knowing I'd probably never be running 37's with ARB lockers and $3k in axles. I'll get a mild spring lift, 35's, bumpers and winches (front and rear), dual batteries, a snorkel and a sport cage and basically call it done. For ME, the Rubi fit the bill perfectly and it performs better than any vehicle I have ever driven off road (in no small part due to the factory lockers.) If you are planning a major build with 37" or larger tires, then I agree with Dawn that getting an X probably makes more sense.
JK Super Freak
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 2
From: North Hampton, NH
Trending Topics
JK Freak
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Spanaway, WA
Originally Posted by Mskh20
My Rubi JKU forgives you this one time for implying she isn't a real trail rig. She can be testy though, so she may not be so forgiving the next time.
IMHO, it really depends on what you want to wheel, where you want your rig build to end up and how long it you think it will take you to save the funds to get there. I love my Rubi and bought it knowing I'd probably never be running 37's with ARB lockers and $3k in axles. I'll get a mild spring lift, 35's, bumpers and winches (front and rear), dual batteries, a snorkel and a sport cage and basically call it done. For ME, the Rubi fit the bill perfectly and it performs better than any vehicle I have ever driven off road (in no small part due to the factory lockers.) If you are planning a major build with 37" or larger tires then, I agree with Dawn that getting an X probably makes more sense.
JK Freak
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 592
Likes: 6
From: Auburn, Alabama
With lifts and such, there are a few considerations (e.g drive shafts). Same with auto vs manual. Decide what you want and then sort out the technical differences between chassis & drivetrain later.
Thread Starter
JK Newbie
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
I'll probably stick with my 35's... The 7's do look sick though! I hunt a lot and live in a rural area so I definitely have use for off road compatibility, but on the other hand, my 23 mile drive to school is a killer for gas. The main things I've seen for improved mpg's/performance are either chips or gears? Which one? if not both?
