Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

4.56 vs 4.88

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 01:46 AM
  #31  
CJ7nvrstk's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Prosper, TX
Default

Originally Posted by JPop
Hmmm, Chrysler boosted their automatic OD ratio by more than 20% from .69 to .84 with a more powerful engine on the 2012s. Pre 2012s there was the same differences from manuals to the automatic JKs. So do the newer JKs have too much differential gear, did the preceding manuals?

It seems to be an army of one who denies the math and so many others experience.
Says the one who claims to know MORE than the jeep engineers and have more resources available to him than them. Fuzzy math using the wrong numbers will do that to you. https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/show...3-gears/page12

There are others who have agreed with me on this subject and have posted such but don't waste their time on here like I do trying to help others out. Like you have said, it's not a one size fits all.

Last edited by CJ7nvrstk; Jan 23, 2012 at 01:58 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 01:52 AM
  #32  
CJ7nvrstk's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Prosper, TX
Default

Originally Posted by MTH
Do you mean numerically "too low," or are you suggesting you should've gone with 4.XXs for 37" tires and a pre-2012 auto trans?



Why wouldn't you want to boost your RPMs from stock numbers, especially for the pre-2012 autos? They're terribly undergeared.
By too low I am referring to a higher number. IE, I went with the 5.13s that the "experts" suggested and would have been better off with 4.88s. This still has your motor turning faster than stock to compensate for the added weight and rolling resistance of larger tires. I am not the only one who has said this though I am the one that says it the most.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 04:47 AM
  #33  
JPop's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, OH
Default

Originally Posted by CJ7nvrstk
Says the one who claims to know MORE than the jeep engineers and have more resources available to him than them. Fuzzy math using the wrong numbers will do that to you. https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/show...3-gears/page12

There are others who have agreed with me on this subject and have posted such but don't waste their time on here like I do trying to help others out. Like you have said, it's not a one size fits all.
Let me know when Chrysler starts rolling JKs off the line with 35s and 37s.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 07:24 AM
  #34  
MTH's Avatar
MTH
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Durham, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by CJ7nvrstk
By too low I am referring to a higher number. IE, I went with the 5.13s that the "experts" suggested and would have been better off with 4.88s. This still has your motor turning faster than stock to compensate for the added weight and rolling resistance of larger tires. I am not the only one who has said this though I am the one that says it the most.
So you think you would be better off spinning only about 200 more RPMs than my 2010 six speed with 33s does in 6th gear? I have stopped using 6th gear altogether, and 200 more RPMs would not be enough to make it useful again. Why would that be where you want your OD to put you? You'd be downshifting all the time.

Christ man, even your 5.13s don't get you to the RPMs put out by a pre-2012 six speed Rubi on stock tires--you're still 300 RPMs shy of that benchmark at 70 mph. You'd need 5.86s just to get there. And that's a STOCK number that Chrysler itself found acceptable.

I read through the thread you linked and it's clear this has been argued to death and there's no convincing either side, so I'm not going to restart it. But knowing your deference to Chrysler, consider that the stock auto pre-2012 Rubis spun 2080 RPMs at 70 mph, and the stock manual pre-2012 Rubis spun 2533 RPMs at 70 mph. Those are Chrysler's flagship Wranglers.

Your 5.13s put you at 2251, more or less in the middle, whereas 4.88s would have put you at 2141, basically replicating the stock auto. So your 5.13s basically "split the difference" that Chrysler found acceptable between the manuals and the autos--sounds like you should find that just about perfect. I can't believe you really think you would have been better going with 37" tires and then just replicating the stock auto trans RPM level that plagued these forums for years with posts about "underpowered" Wranglers.

Of course, either 4.88s or 5.13s on a pre-2012 auto will be a big improvement over the stock 3.73s for 37" tires. But at the end of the day, I think you're just dissatisfied with the 3.8. Gears and RPMs can only to so much for power and you can only squeeze so many mpgs out of a particular engine. You're looking for power and fuel economy while rolling 37" tires on a 4k pound lifted vehicle that's shaped like a dishwasher--there aren't any Yukons you can cram into those differentials that will make it pull like a Hemi with the mpgs of a Prius.

Last edited by MTH; Jan 23, 2012 at 07:31 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 06:01 PM
  #35  
rb1boxer_3's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: corpus christi, tx
Default

So I have a ?. I plan on getting 35s but will move on to 37s later so i would lk to know what gears would be best. It's a 2012 jkur auto. mainly used for mudding and beach. Not really a dd or a high speed jeep.so gas mpg doesn't matter to me. Let me know.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 06:32 PM
  #36  
blue project's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 1
From: Cape Cod
Default

Originally Posted by rb1boxer_3
So I have a ?. I plan on getting 35s but will move on to 37s later so i would lk to know what gears would be best. It's a 2012 jkur auto. mainly used for mudding and beach. Not really a dd or a high speed jeep.so gas mpg doesn't matter to me. Let me know.
I would say start with the stock gearing and go from there. The new 5 speed auto is a lot better with the stock 3.73's. The chart does say 4.56 would be ideal for both sizes. Plan on spending 750 for the 4.56's. They are uncommon therefore the most costly.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:13 AM.