Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Numbers game?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 05:47 PM
  #1  
msquaredIN's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Fishers, IN
Default Numbers game?

HELP! I have done a bunch of research but I am missing something...

I want to get 35" (or close) tires for my 2 door Rubicon. I have narrowed it down to Goodyear MTR or Duratrac (I think) I want something good in ice and snow and still good for all around off road.

So why go with one of the following over the other?
305/70/17 vs 315/70/17 vs 35 12.50 17???
I know the 305 is slightly shorter weighs a bit less but whats the deal with the 315 vs the 35x12.50?

This is one piece of the puzzle. I am tired of beating up the underside of my rubi trying to follow Jeeps on 35s. So I think its time for 35s and a lift.

Thanks for your input.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 06:03 PM
  #2  
SergeantChuck's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: Cabot, AR
Default

I just bought the 315/70-17. Basically because you cant get the BFG A/T KO in 35x12.50-17

The 315/70-17 is only 12.4 wide and 34.5 tall.

I would say that is the difference if your 35x12.50-17s are actually 35" tall
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 06:04 PM
  #3  
Ryan0260's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,054
Likes: 85
From: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Default

Metric sizes drive me nuts. I would go 35X12.50. And of your choices I prefer aggressive so mtr
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 07:32 PM
  #4  
paulp575's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Spokane WA
Default Re: Numbers game?

Check out the April 2011 issue of FW magazine. They did a 10 tire shootout and be prepared for a shocking first place tire!
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 07:31 AM
  #5  
ormandj's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX USA
Default

Originally Posted by paulp575
Check out the April 2011 issue of FW magazine. They did a 10 tire shootout and be prepared for a shocking first place tire!
Can't hyperlink, so search Google for "april 2011 four wheeler magazine mud tire shootout intro".

1) Hankook Dynapro MT
2) Goodyear Wrangler MT/R with Kevlar
3) Mickey Thompson Baja MTZ
4) Nitto Trail Grappler M/T
5) Yokohama Geolandar M/T

You can get the other 5 from the article.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 10:11 AM
  #6  
msquaredIN's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Fishers, IN
Default

Originally Posted by ormandj
Can't hyperlink, so search Google for "april 2011 four wheeler magazine mud tire shootout intro".

1) Hankook Dynapro MT
2) Goodyear Wrangler MT/R with Kevlar
3) Mickey Thompson Baja MTZ
4) Nitto Trail Grappler M/T
5) Yokohama Geolandar M/T

You can get the other 5 from the article.
I did read that article. I am after a good off road tire BUT I am most concerned with snow and ice performace. It seems the duratrac gets the best reviews in that environment. I figure great ice/snow performace with good offroad performance is more important on a DD than great offroad and questionable ice/snow performance.
For some reason I am torn between the duratrac and MTR. Several Indiana Jeep owners have told me they are decent in ice/snow.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 10:17 AM
  #7  
Ryan0260's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,054
Likes: 85
From: Hendersonville, Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by ludski
nitto trail grapplers will be great in the snow. (im in chicago) i just got them so i cant test em yet.
but they are soft. and wide. will be good for snow.
Yes they are good in snow. Had them out several times last winter and they did great
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 06:46 AM
  #8  
msquaredIN's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Fishers, IN
Default

Any more input on my question?

So why go with one of the following over the other?
305/70/17 vs 315/70/17 vs 35 12.50 17???
I know the 305 is slightly shorter weighs a bit less but whats the deal with the 315 vs the 35x12.50?

I don't want to start another what's the best tire thread. Just trying to figure out the size puzzle.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 07:03 AM
  #9  
Beau's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Aurora, IL
Default Tire Size

Originally Posted by msquaredIN
Any more input on my question?

So why go with one of the following over the other?
305/70/17 vs 315/70/17 vs 35 12.50 17???
I know the 305 is slightly shorter weighs a bit less but whats the deal with the 315 vs the 35x12.50?

I don't want to start another what's the best tire thread. Just trying to figure out the size puzzle.
305 is the width, not height.
305 mm wide = 12 inches wide (305/25.4 = 12.007 inches)
315/25.4 = 12.4

Next number is the aspect ratio (take the width times the ratio times two for two sidewalls)
12.007 * 2 * 0.7 = 16.809 in total sidewall height
12.4*0.7*.2 = 17.36 total sidewall height

Add this value to the wheel diameter for total tire height
16.809+17 = 33.809 inches in total height
17.36 + 17 = 34.36 inches in total height

If you want a 35 then go with the 315/70/17 tire (34.4) or the 35X12.5 tire
Your best bet for a metric tire is 325/70/17 = 34.9 inch tall tire
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 07:18 AM
  #10  
msquaredIN's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Fishers, IN
Default

Wow good info. But why do people go with the 315 instead of the 35/12.50/17? The 35 even seems cheaper if you can find em.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:27 PM.