Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Replacing the brakes... stock or performance

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 06:14 AM
  #11  
armycop's Avatar
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 2
From: Lacey, WA
Default

Auto Zone has their "Duralast Gold" brakes with a "lifetime warranty". Don't know how good they are, but they are ceramic pads for around $36.99
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #12  
Imkman's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Default

thanks alot guys

and i have no idea how the rears went first over the front and i have 53,000km on it... i havnt done any smoke shows but alot of off roading...

i thought it was odd too... any ideas why? other then the delightful video lol
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #13  
Ilovemy08jk's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Fallon NV
Default

Originally Posted by JulianK
There's always something better than stock! However, I find that in our case the stock setup is more than adequate (for my purposes anyway). The JK isn't exactly what I'd call a 'high performance' vehicle and the stock discs are just fine for what we mostly do. Besides, you shouldn't replace just the rear rotors with drilled/slotted ones. You'd have to do a whole brake kit and that ain't cheap.....and like I said, frankly not worth the expense when there's plenty of other cool stuff you can get for the grand or so you're gonna blow.

Just my two cents.
Id have to agree with you....its not a High Performance vehicle..it a Jeep. Id think that slotted of drilled rotors would collect dirt mud or rock in the slots or holes. Just go with stock rotors and upgrade the pads
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 09:52 AM
  #14  
LemonTwist's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Bitterroot Valley, MT
Default

I used to have the same experience, front brake pads wearing out MUCH faster than the rear. On newer vehicles, they seem to have compensated for that by making the contact area of the rear pads much less than the fronts. I was way surprised that my F150 rear pads wore out first, until I compared them with the front pads.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #15  
racer83l's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
Default

im pretty sure the reason for the rears to go out first is because of the EBD.. the Jeep applies more friction to the rear pads to help the Jeep from "Diving" during braking. and its usually the right rear pad the wears out first.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 02:29 PM
  #16  
hawgrider1200's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: on the banks of the ocmulgee , GA
Default

Originally Posted by JK-KJ
Why would your rear pads need replacing and not the front? The front wears twice as fast as the rear, or at least that's the case on every vehicle I've owned so far.
ESP might b the reason.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 04:32 PM
  #17  
Suffolk JK's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by JK-KJ
Why would your rear pads need replacing and not the front? The front wears twice as fast as the rear, or at least that's the case on every vehicle I've owned so far.
Because people have had issues on their JKs where the rear pads wear faster than the front for some reason. Bad materials on the pad, too small of a pad to begin with, who knows...
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:55 PM.