Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Superchips flashpaq gas mileage savings spreadsheet!

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-18-2010, 05:23 AM
  #41  
JK Junkie
 
JPop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lakewood, OH
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bwiencek

I don't think MOST of the people are going off the miles driven divided by the gallons used method - they are relying on the dash display to "tell" them the good news and not using a true calculation - the dash displays are a controlled guess at best and since the JK doesn't have a true pair of fuel flowmeters installed (to measure supplied fuel - return fuel = used fuel) then they have to base estimations off of fuel injector flow and injector pulse width averages - I know the factory was OFF in it's calculation - I've tracked mine for over 30k miles so far and not once has the factory been closer than .7 mpg to the 'real' MPG - most of the times 1-1.5 MPG off is usual.

I asked a long time ago if anyone tracked their economy over time and got hardly a response with only one or two "spot checks" on long road trips and such - maybe now that it's been out for a while someone has tracked it over say 10-15 tankfulls (both factory and superchips tuned) and can give a better real average...
I calculate every tankful and by hand, OK really my iphone and make a notation on the receipt. I always keep notes of anything out of the ordinary that went on with that tankful, so I can throw out any outliers.

The computer has a window that it will overstate your gas mileage, generally to the bogging down portion of the power band. If you keep your rpms up in the 2500 range it is fairly accurate, or at least on my JK.

If you make a conscious effort to improve your fuel mileage, it's not much of a problem to pull an additional 5-10% efficiency. If you drive it like you stole it, that pendulum swings the other way.

With the use of a programmer be it Superchips or Hypertech I did and do see fuel mileage improvements. In round numbers the same 5-10%, but I can bank on 5%. Running the 93 octane tune on the superchips flashpaq I can pull pretty close to 10% better than stock and can justify the additional fuel costs in the summer.

So while I think some of these numbers are overstated, I think some other ones tell the story as it is. I also believe that regularly checking your mileage tells a pretty good story about what is going on with any vehicle, and when things get out of whack it's time to start looking for things, be it plugs, wires or inflation rates on tires.

I have also found that I get better mileage when I get fuel from the same place. Not to say that one fuel is better than another, but from brand to brand not having any inconsistencies to deal with seems to keep the PCM happy.
Old 03-18-2010, 05:35 AM
  #42  
JK Newbie
 
Mtn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Grand Junction/ Broomfield CO
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont mean to get off topic but with the Superchips can you use it on multiple jeeps or is it set for only one? Thanks
Old 03-18-2010, 08:32 AM
  #43  
JK Enthusiast
 
wmcvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mtn Man
I dont mean to get off topic but with the Superchips can you use it on multiple jeeps or is it set for only one? Thanks
I have read on the forum that it is just one at a time. You can use it on multiple Jeeps, but would have to restore the stock setting on the first one before you could use it on the next.
Old 03-21-2010, 04:22 PM
  #44  
JK Enthusiast
 
reynolr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reynolr
Ok. I am trusting you guys on this one. I just ordered the flashpaq from Northridge. My wife will be so proud of me.

Gas mileage improvement will be a plus but I am mainly looking for some performance increase as well as looking forward to getting my speedo calibrated correctly since the 35s have it messed up pretty good.
Ok men. I did as I said and ordered the Flashpaq. Price was definitely right from Northridge and David got it out to me super fast. Now for the bad news. I don't see what all the hype is about. It did allow me to get my speedo matched up to my tires but I can't tell any difference in the performance area. I even cleaned the old K&N just before doing the update but honestly I don't feel any difference. I even went with the 93 octane update even though I have always used 87 (yes I filled her up with 93 as well) and still nothing. Any thoughts from those of you that professed that your JK was now just a tick away from Ferrari type power?
Old 03-21-2010, 04:58 PM
  #45  
JK Junkie
 
JPop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lakewood, OH
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't remember anyone who professed they were getting Ferrari type performance from their JK after installing a Flashpaq.

What I can tell you is some of the posts with this upgrade, and for that matter any other performance upgrade, overstate the gains.

That said, you do have some tools available on your Flashpaq to quantify your improvements. For instance, I did some 0-60 tests and the differences were more than my butt meter anticipated. If I recall correctly, w/o the Flashpaq 9.84 seconds and with the Flashpaq 9.14 seconds. That's not Ferrari times, but it's a substantial gain.

There have been Flashpaq users who have not seen gains out of the box. This seems to be a PCM re-learn issue. As I have suggested to others, and they later shared their stories of success, you can hasten the re-learn process by doing a series of freeway on ramp blast at close to or near WOT.

MY experience has been with any programmer change, be it on my Hemi Dodge Ram or my JK it takes about a tankful of fuel before everything is close to dialed in. I have also noted that there is a progression with fuel mileage, and generally into the third tank before the improvements level off.

So if you were expecting V8 performance undoubtedly you will be disappointed. If you exert some patience and attempt to quantify your results, you should see an improvement. My level of expectations were met when the Flashpaq exceeded the performance of my former programmer. For you perhaps the bar was higher and it won't deliver up to your expectations.

BTW, what gears do you have in your rig?



Originally Posted by reynolr
Ok men. I did as I said and ordered the Flashpaq. Price was definitely right from Northridge and David got it out to me super fast. Now for the bad news. I don't see what all the hype is about. It did allow me to get my speedo matched up to my tires but I can't tell any difference in the performance area. I even cleaned the old K&N just before doing the update but honestly I don't feel any difference. I even went with the 93 octane update even though I have always used 87 (yes I filled her up with 93 as well) and still nothing. Any thoughts from those of you that professed that your JK was now just a tick away from Ferrari type power?
Old 03-25-2010, 07:01 PM
  #46  
JK Enthusiast
 
reynolr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was being a little facetious with the ferrari comment but I really do not feel any difference. I am running the crappy 3.21 gears but they are the same crappy 3.21 gears that I was running pre install. Keep in mind that I am basing this on town driving as I don't really have much opportunity to take it off road much. I didn't expect to mistake it for a sports car but I was hoping to be able to feel just a little difference. Maybe it will be as you say and after a tank or two it will pick up some. I remain cautiously optimistic.

Originally Posted by JPop
I can't remember anyone who professed they were getting Ferrari type performance from their JK after installing a Flashpaq.

What I can tell you is some of the posts with this upgrade, and for that matter any other performance upgrade, overstate the gains.

That said, you do have some tools available on your Flashpaq to quantify your improvements. For instance, I did some 0-60 tests and the differences were more than my butt meter anticipated. If I recall correctly, w/o the Flashpaq 9.84 seconds and with the Flashpaq 9.14 seconds. That's not Ferrari times, but it's a substantial gain.

There have been Flashpaq users who have not seen gains out of the box. This seems to be a PCM re-learn issue. As I have suggested to others, and they later shared their stories of success, you can hasten the re-learn process by doing a series of freeway on ramp blast at close to or near WOT.

MY experience has been with any programmer change, be it on my Hemi Dodge Ram or my JK it takes about a tankful of fuel before everything is close to dialed in. I have also noted that there is a progression with fuel mileage, and generally into the third tank before the improvements level off.

So if you were expecting V8 performance undoubtedly you will be disappointed. If you exert some patience and attempt to quantify your results, you should see an improvement. My level of expectations were met when the Flashpaq exceeded the performance of my former programmer. For you perhaps the bar was higher and it won't deliver up to your expectations.

BTW, what gears do you have in your rig?
Old 03-27-2010, 08:09 AM
  #47  
JK Newbie
 
Mud Bug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Marysville, MI
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Northridge 4x4 and Superchips

Received my Superchips 3875 Flashpaq from Northridge 4x4 Thursday and made an install Friday. Northridge has a great price and rocketed the thing across country to my house at light speed. It's really a good feeling having the speedometer back on after installing the 35's. I put the gas saving tune in for daily driving and can't wait to get to the off road park and try the crawl tune on the rocks. The Flashpaq is straight forward enough that I don't need to keep the instructions with it now that I've done an install. I for one really like this thing and if I had it to do all over again, I would.
Old 03-27-2010, 01:38 PM
  #48  
CJK
JK Enthusiast
 
CJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by reynolr
I was being a little facetious with the ferrari comment but I really do not feel any difference. I am running the crappy 3.21 gears but they are the same crappy 3.21 gears that I was running pre install. Keep in mind that I am basing this on town driving as I don't really have much opportunity to take it off road much. I didn't expect to mistake it for a sports car but I was hoping to be able to feel just a little difference. Maybe it will be as you say and after a tank or two it will pick up some. I remain cautiously optimistic.
The guys stuck running the overheating automatics (like me) feel more of a benefit from recalibrating for tire size because it corrects the shift points of the tranny. I noticed from your info that you're running 35's on 3.21 gears with a 6 speed. A programmer isn't going to overcome that math. Sell the programmer to someone with an auto, regear your axles, and use the cheaper AEV Procal to recalibrate your speedo for tire and gear change. I'm betting you don't even use 6th anymore unless you're on a long downhill on interstate. You need an axle ratio in the upper 4 (4.88?) or lower 5 range to get the gerbils back in their power band. With your current setup I doubt you'd even feel much difference if you programmed for premium fuel (and filled up with high-test) - there's only so much we can squeeze out of these little van motors and your gear ratios are definitely working against you.

Last edited by CJK; 03-27-2010 at 01:42 PM.
Old 03-27-2010, 03:37 PM
  #49  
JK Junkie
 
JPop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lakewood, OH
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CJK
The guys stuck running the overheating automatics (like me) feel more of a benefit from recalibrating for tire size because it corrects the shift points of the tranny. I noticed from your info that you're running 35's on 3.21 gears with a 6 speed. A programmer isn't going to overcome that math. Sell the programmer to someone with an auto, regear your axles, and use the cheaper AEV Procal to recalibrate your speedo for tire and gear change. I'm betting you don't even use 6th anymore unless you're on a long downhill on interstate. You need an axle ratio in the upper 4 (4.88?) or lower 5 range to get the gerbils back in their power band. With your current setup I doubt you'd even feel much difference if you programmed for premium fuel (and filled up with high-test) - there's only so much we can squeeze out of these little van motors and your gear ratios are definitely working against you.
Sorry, but I don't exactly subscribe to that. Even with 3.21s and 35s, you get into the power band at about 15mph with a 6 speed. If your shifting into 2nd at 3k you pretty much stay in the power band. Certainly at highway speeds 6th is going to be bogged down a bit, but you don't need to make that shift. So somewhere, and provided that there is a power gain, you should be able to realize it. If you are short shifting into second, and bogging the engine down with shifts into 6th at 50mph you aren't.

Assuredly you need to gears to make the best use of your transmission and tire size, no contention at all on that point. However to suggest that the only way to discern a power gain is with an automatic transmission and gears as prescribed is at best naive.
Old 03-27-2010, 04:37 PM
  #50  
CJK
JK Enthusiast
 
CJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JPop
Sorry, but I don't exactly subscribe to that. Even with 3.21s and 35s, you get into the power band at about 15mph with a 6 speed. If your shifting into 2nd at 3k you pretty much stay in the power band. Certainly at highway speeds 6th is going to be bogged down a bit, but you don't need to make that shift. So somewhere, and provided that there is a power gain, you should be able to realize it. If you are short shifting into second, and bogging the engine down with shifts into 6th at 50mph you aren't.

Assuredly you need to gears to make the best use of your transmission and tire size, no contention at all on that point. However to suggest that the only way to discern a power gain is with an automatic transmission and gears as prescribed is at best naive.
The 3.8 JK is a pig. Handicap it and it's even worse. The power gains to be had from the programmers (I've run both) are minimal at best. I love the power of the fuel injected 258 in my CJ but it rides like a logging truck. Naive is thinking you're going to be happy with 3.21 axle ratio trying to spin 35's with our minivan engine. Just my 2 cents.



Quick Reply: Superchips flashpaq gas mileage savings spreadsheet!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:01 PM.