Notices
Stock JK Tech Bulletin board forum regarding issues with OE (original equipment) components of the Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) such as factory suspension parts, engine, transmission, body parts, interior fixtures and the on-board computer.

What's the problem with the 3.8 engine

Old Oct 12, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #1  
Frog Rubicon's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default What's the problem with the 3.8 engine

Sometimes I don't understand human beings.

Half of the Jeepers don't like the stock engine because there is not enough HP, therefore they want the Hemi engine.

The other half of the Jeepers prefer the diesel version with less HP!!!

What's the problem with the 3.8 engine? Personally, I think it's a great engine. Not too big, not too thirsty, and strong enough to climb the Rubicon Trail
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 01:34 PM
  #2  
echofoxtrot's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Prince Rupert, British Columbia, Canada
Default

The diesel engine has way better torque, that matters a lot more than horsepower in this vehicle. Having said that the 3.8 is ok, you just need the right diff. gears (which I don't, haha).
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 01:37 PM
  #3  
ronjenx's Avatar
JK Jedi Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,904
Likes: 185
From: Maine
Default

Originally Posted by Frog Rubicon
Sometimes I don't understand human beings.

Half of the Jeepers don't like the stock engine because there is not enough HP, therefore they want the Hemi engine.

The other half of the Jeepers prefer the diesel version with less HP!!!

What's the problem with the 3.8 engine? Personally, I think it's a great engine. Not too big, not too thirsty, and strong enough to climb the Rubicon Trail
Horse power isn't what you are after with a diesel. It's the torque at low rpm's. (Which, by definition, equates to more horse power at the low rpm)
Personally, I think the 3.8 is doing just fine. I have 4.10's.

Last edited by ronjenx; Oct 12, 2008 at 01:40 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #4  
08RUBIJK's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Quad Cities - Iowa
Default

I think the 3.8L is OK. I like the extra room under the hood - makes it easy to maintain and inspect. A little more torque would be nice, but it does pretty good in 4L.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 01:43 PM
  #5  
jeeperjkj's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Guam - PCSing to McGuire AFB, NJ in July '09
Default

Is that a real question?

Seriously, torque is where it's at when wheelin'.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #6  
scottrock's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Default

I can see why those with an Unlimited and an auto might complain about performance but in a 2 door with a 6 speed it's just fine.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 01:53 PM
  #7  
Candlemuse's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

3.8 L , 2 door is just fine .
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 12, 2008 | 01:57 PM
  #8  
gtlegg's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Candlemuse
3.8 L , 2 door is just fine .
yes yes yes
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #9  
derff96963's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Mt Pleasant, PA
Default

The problem is the high revs to get power. It has lots of power over 3k RPM. However I don't like to have to rev an engine that high on a regular basis to get power. I am coming from a 2000 XJ with the 4.0L I6 and I still own a 82 CJ7 with the 258 I6. After that the lack of low end power is very evident. It has power just not in the range I would like.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #10  
PoorDad's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 1
From: SCV, Ca
Default

95% of the time, I can not complain. It is OK.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 PM.