Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

2012 Lifted - Exhaust Issue

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 07:41 PM
  #11  
MortuaR's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Cibolo, TX
Default

midwesterner: Is your 2012 JKU auto or manual? Not sure that makes a difference, but curious.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #12  
Lotus F1's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 266
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by midwesterner
No. I purchased a new set of Bilstein 5100 shocks. The front shocks are 24.63 long versus the stock front at 22.0.
Ok makes sense... from reading your initial post it was not clear and could cause some confusion, as the stock 2012 will not have this driveshaft/exhaust issue when 2.5" or lower.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 03:08 AM
  #13  
midwesterner's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Arnold, Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by MortuaR
midwesterner: Is your 2012 JKU auto or manual? Not sure that makes a difference, but curious.
It is an auto.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 03:14 AM
  #14  
midwesterner's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Arnold, Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by Lotus F1
Ok makes sense... from reading your initial post it was not clear and could cause some confusion, as the stock 2012 will not have this driveshaft/exhaust issue when 2.5" or lower.
Thats why i selected that length for the front shock. I thought i might get by without messing with any changes to the exhaust or drive shaft since i was only extending the front 2.63 beyond stock. Im suprised that Jeep left such little clearance in this area. I mean its not like anyone would ever lift a Jeep:-)) what were they thinking????
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 03:59 AM
  #15  
OutlawJK's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: artesia, nm
Default

Just add the spacers on the stock exhaust
You do not need a DS on a 12 with
2.5" lift


Sent from my iPhone
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 04:21 AM
  #16  
brc450's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by midwesterner
Thats why i selected that length for the front shock. I thought i might get by without messing with any changes to the exhaust or drive shaft since i was only extending the front 2.63 beyond stock. Im suprised that Jeep left such little clearance in this area. I mean its not like anyone would ever lift a Jeep:-)) what were they thinking????
Teraflex makes an exhaust spacer kit for this issue. Have a 12 2 door with 2.5 coil lift. Installed the spacer at the same time as the lift. No rubbing at all. Kit is pretty cheap and will take 30 min to install.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 05:30 AM
  #17  
lensstj's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Default

The AFE Y pipe will give you the most clearance and fix the issue now and in the future. Spacers are a cheap fix move it out of the way but not as far as the Y pipe. The spacers introduce more seams in the exhaust up to you if that is an issue or not. The y pipe is a one for one swap.
A new DS may or may not fix the issue completely if you have a lot of flex it may not but you only have a 2.5 so maybe... I would get the Y pipe just my .02
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 05:36 AM
  #18  
Littlejon's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: Des Moines, Iowa
Default

Even with a new drive shaft there is still a good chance that you will hit the exhaust. I would do the exhaust (either the TF spacers, or AFE Y-pipe), and get the new driveshaft down the road.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 05:55 AM
  #19  
Lotus F1's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 266
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by midwesterner

Thats why i selected that length for the front shock. I thought i might get by without messing with any changes to the exhaust or drive shaft since i was only extending the front 2.63 beyond stock. Im suprised that Jeep left such little clearance in this area. I mean its not like anyone would ever lift a Jeep:-)) what were they thinking????
Ironically that small amount is exactly how they plan on fixing the issue in the 2.5" lift kit that includes there aftermarket shocks. They will shorten them that small amount so spacers aren't needed...and yeah crazy who would want to lift a Jeep lol
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 06:12 AM
  #20  
wayoflife's Avatar
JK-Forum Founder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 36,534
Likes: 16
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Full-Traction Suspension
Replace the driveshaft. It needs it anways. Just look at the angle of the factory shaft coming out of the transfercase.
agreed. i would get the new shaft as you'll need it anyway. your drive shaft will now be sitting at a steep enough angle that the cv boot at the output shaft will be in a constant state of pinch. this will ultimately result in it failing sooner than later. being that a new drive shaft will not have a slip shaft boot, even if you still hit the exhaust crossover, it won't be a big deal. if it's really a problem for you, the TF spacers are cheap and will remedy that too.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:10 PM.