Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

33's or 35's

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 01:17 PM
  #31  
RedneckJeep's Avatar
JK Jedi
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,215
Likes: 10
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by TEEJ
For the street, 33's are fine...for mud, the fatter and longer footprint of the 35's will make you much more capable, provide more flotation, less bogging down, and more over all traction, and help keep the diffs/axles from acting as anchors, etc.



In mud, 35's make a difference vs 33's.

My ex wife had a really long fat footprint but when I threw her in the mud she sank.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 01:24 PM
  #32  
Semi888's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: North Shore, MA
Default

Originally Posted by RedneckJeep
My ex wife had a really long fat footprint but when I threw her in the mud she sank.
HAHAHA
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #33  
sw0cb's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Winter Park, FL
Default

So is 2.5 BB and 35s a workable combination, or am i going to run into alot of trouble offroad? This isnt really a show truck so even though i drive on the street how it looks isnt the most important thing, its second on the list
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #34  
muttschu's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by RocksHurt
I put 33" KM2s on last night. I love it and won't consider 35s until I wear these out. Don't get me wonrg, the 35s do look nice; so do the 37s (see my point?).

2.5 BB and 33s were the way to fly for me and I have no regrets so far (14 hours).
Hey RocksHurt, could you post some pics? I want to buy the KM2's and wonder how it looks. Also, did they fit okay on the stock tire carrier?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #35  
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Northern, Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by muttschu
Hey RocksHurt, could you post some pics? I want to buy the KM2's and wonder how it looks. Also, did they fit okay on the stock tire carrier?
It fits great on the stock carrier, I just neet o get some vibration support extensions (rubber hose). I was amazed at how big the lugs are on the tires. If it did not have the cuts in them one can easily mistake them for crawlers. I also am amazed how they handle on the road and are not much louder than the goodyear radials. I am very happy.

Here are some pics that I have taken.






Last edited by RocksHurt; Feb 28, 2008 at 03:09 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #36  
muttschu's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by RocksHurt
It fits great on the stock carrier, I just neet o get some vibration support extensions (rubber hose). I was amazed at how big the lugs are on the tires. If it did not have the cuts in them one can easily mistake them for crawlers. I also am amazed how they handle on the road and are not much louder than the goodyear radials. I am very happy.

Here are some pics that I have taken.





Very Nice. I think that helps me make up my mind. BFG KM2's are the way to go.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #37  
S4M14M's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

Snag the 35s...I think it is the perfect stance for the JK w / the 2.5....Your jeep will be begging you for them otherwise. Power loss is not that bad unless you are up and down hills all day. The only regret I have is that I bought ATs instead of MTs.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #38  
MikeULX's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by easttnruby
Yes, 35's will fit with a 2.5" BB. You wont alot of room for flexing but they will fit and ride down the road fine.

Bro I looked at your gallery and with that set up it looks great but on your flexed pics your way into your fender flares so i say 33s with a 2.5. Id go 35s with 3" lift and 1" spacers front and rear to stay out of the fenders.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 04:54 AM
  #39  
Frozen40's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by easttnruby
I installed 33's before I lifted the Rubi at all. After adding the 3" FT lift I liked the flex I got with the 33's........



...., but I had to have the 35's!


Nice lookn jeep.
Do you have the auto or the 6spd?

I'd love to get 35s but I'm still on the highway a lot and sounds like 35s with 4.10s and an auto would be a real dog? Any thoughts?

Did you have to regear your rubi to get decent power?
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:46 AM
  #40  
150's Avatar
150
Fallen Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: I get around
Default

Originally Posted by MikeULX
All you guys that have the 33 s post some pics??? Please!
Here are my 33's
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Picture 093 (Small).jpg
Views:	156
Size:	29.8 KB
ID:	6578  
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:25 PM.