Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

5.13 gears

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 06:13 AM
  #121  
DGriz's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Porterville, CA
Default

Originally Posted by SunnyD
I knew it!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 06:30 AM
  #122  
kntr's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
From: Montana
Default

My head hurts after reading all this.

All I know is my 37s and 5.38s have way more power than my 37s and 5.13s. I am so glad I went to the 5.38s. It down shifts less on hills and pulls much better. Ive only had the 5.38s for a few weeks, so Im not sure how the mileage has been affected. Mine is an auto. I couldnt be more happy with the 5.38s, unless I had a 6.4 hemi and that wont happen until the Jeep is paid off.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 09:10 AM
  #123  
jimk403's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, Colorado
Default

I find this thread to be extremely amusing, so I thought I would bring it back top.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:32 AM
  #124  
WY-JK10's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Cokeville, Wyoming
Default

Was entertained by the the amusing pokes back & forth, but more so liked the back ups being presented in the debate. Have a 2010 JKU Rubi factory loaded with no mods that I'm trading for a 2012 JKU that's on order. Do plan on on a small lift & bigger tires so have followed this thread with interest. Even with stock tires the 2010 with auto & 410 gears does to much shifting for my taste at freeway speed, but fine else wise. The big differences with the new motor & trans in the 2012 has been a challenge to sort out whats best for me between the 373 & the 410 now. With the very slick Wyoming winter roads run the 32 inch 255/75/17 blizzaks in the winter & will continue to do so with the new 2012. Want only a minimal lift to run 33 km2 255/80/17 or 285/70/17 in the summer & to help some over the rocks, so to stay in what I think is the sweet spot for me from many hours of reading threads here have changed my order from 410 to 373.

Last edited by WY-JK10; Jan 25, 2012 at 10:36 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 03:36 PM
  #125  
CJ7nvrstk's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Prosper, TX
Default

Originally Posted by SunnyD
I knew it!


I knew someone would do this!









Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 05:05 PM
  #126  
jimk403's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, Colorado
Default

Click image for larger version

Name:	20120125_143900.jpg
Views:	219
Size:	41.3 KB
ID:	269916
I can take pics too. Looks like similar rpm/mph to the previously posted pic. Difference is, this is with 5.38 gears and 315/70-17 tires. Without the gears, my rpm's would not be enough to maintain any kind of speed.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 06:54 PM
  #127  
JPop's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, OH
Default

Originally Posted by planman

Stock tune torque specs on the dyno chart and spreadsheet above:

2000 rpm: 169

2500 rpm: 184

Or, with a regular Hypertech tune (you wouldn't use a premium tune if you were concerned about economy because it costs 10%+ more than regular):

2000 rpm: 182

2500 rpm: 193

How much torque is needed for a lifted, 5500 lbs 4 dr JK on 37s to push it up a mile highway grade with wind drag at 70 mph without frequent downshifting?

Another issue is that doing a gear comparison with a Viper TB on the JK messes it up. Few will ever spend the $ and time to switch out TB's. They regear and do a tuner--unless their model year doesn't have an available tuner like the '11s and they are stuck with the stock tune.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wish I had time to respond to this. There needs to be clarity on torque, and the rate that torque is applied (horsepower).

Especially like the putzing around at 50mph. Truly comical and I've already spoke of the exponentially increasing drag with speed.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2012 | 02:02 AM
  #128  
CJ7nvrstk's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Prosper, TX
Default

Originally Posted by JPop
Wish I had time to respond to this. There needs to be clarity on torque, and the rate that torque is applied (horsepower).

Especially like the putzing around at 50mph. Truly comical and I've already spoke of the exponentially increasing drag with speed.
Of course you don't have time. Why? Because my point has been proven and you just don't like it.

And still unwilling to respond to the previous absurd statement that does wonders for credibility.

Last edited by CJ7nvrstk; Jan 26, 2012 at 02:13 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2012 | 02:11 AM
  #129  
CJ7nvrstk's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Prosper, TX
Default

Originally Posted by jimk403
Attachment 269916
I can take pics too. Looks like similar rpm/mph to the previously posted pic. Difference is, this is with 5.38 gears and 315/70-17 tires. Without the gears, my rpm's would not be enough to maintain any kind of speed.
Jim, again, I am not suggesting what you imply. I am suggesting that a modded 3.8 can turn 37s at normal driving speeds with 4.88 gears. The chart and torque numbers supplied by Planman support this but too many hear want to ignore those figures. Why? Because it has become gospel that with 37s you need 5.13s or lower gears that has been repeated so many times it has become "fact", even though the numbers (math and science) disprove that.

Oh, and btw, you're rpm is several hundred rpm higher than what I posted. Yours also is lifted, further increasing drag, has increased rolling resistance r/t heavier tires and increased drag, and also note that your ECO indicator is not on while mine is, so simply.... that dog don't hunt. Totally different comparison. Please return to the area where I was discussing 1900-2200 rpm as optimal for cruising.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2012 | 02:17 AM
  #130  
CJ7nvrstk's Avatar
JK Super Freak
Vet Army

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Prosper, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Raiderfan001
The differences in opinions on gearing is kind of interesting. For some people the stock setup is inadequate and the 3.8 is too weak and slow. Yet for me (stock 3.21s and stock 32s...I think they measure to a 31) I have no complaints at all. I can drive to work and theres only one steep hill where it will downshift to make it up. The rest I can ease on the gas a little bit without it downshifting and keeping the 55 speed limit. And if i'm driving say 45 and want to accelerate to 55 I can do it without downshifting. Just easing onto the gas is enough. Yet theres people that say they can't do that. Maybe it's because i'm the type thats not in a hurry tailgating the guy in front of me and passing everyone.

I still don't know what gears I will end up getting for 35's
As Jpop has stated, it's not always one size fits all. I tend to drive like you describe so I don't feel I need 5.38s and 33s like others here do. I had 5.13s and 37s on my 08 and am saying 4.88s would have been adequate for me, also allowing better mileage. The torque figures supplied by Planman support this. I just don't understand how some poeple find that so difficult to understand.

So, it's basically what works for you.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 AM.