Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

My thoughts on lifts

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 29, 2014 | 03:12 PM
  #341  
Creatrix98's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Shippensburg, PA
Default

I have read through this thread and there is a lot of fantastic info. I have a 2014 JKUR on order and I am ordering part for its arrival. I have determined that I want a 2.5" lift but I am stuck on the various types. I don't want to blow the bank but I would like a good starting point to build off of as the Jeep evolves. I am concerned with the types of spring rates that aid in articulation, handling, ride and resistance to sagging. Would a dual or progressive rate spring be ideal over a linear one? I will be running a 35" tire with the future being at 37" and flat fenders.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2014 | 08:34 AM
  #342  
Jeepstin12's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 1
From: Denver, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Creatrix98
I have read through this thread and there is a lot of fantastic info. I have a 2014 JKUR on order and I am ordering part for its arrival. I have determined that I want a 2.5" lift but I am stuck on the various types. I don't want to blow the bank but I would like a good starting point to build off of as the Jeep evolves. I am concerned with the types of spring rates that aid in articulation, handling, ride and resistance to sagging. Would a dual or progressive rate spring be ideal over a linear one? I will be running a 35" tire with the future being at 37" and flat fenders.
I am not 100% on this! but others may have direct experience. I'm thinking if you plan on 37's in the future, installing a 2.5" now, you may be trimming some body and pinch seams later. If you will eventually run 37's, best (and more cost effective as well as less down time) to set up for it now, even if running 35's.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2014 | 10:23 AM
  #343  
Creatrix98's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Shippensburg, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Jeepstin12
I am not 100% on this! but others may have direct experience. I'm thinking if you plan on 37's in the future, installing a 2.5" now, you may be trimming some body and pinch seams later. If you will eventually run 37's, best (and more cost effective as well as less down time) to set up for it now, even if running 35's.
When the time comes for 37's I will be doing some trimming and/or 1/2" spacers.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2014 | 03:39 AM
  #344  
Scruff's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Hi all. I have a shorty on 37s with a 2 synergy coils, fox shocks and arb adjustable track bar (and lots of cutting and grinding done). Do you think it is worthwhile getting adjustable lower control arms with such a small lift?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2014 | 06:30 AM
  #345  
TheDirtman's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

It depends on if you need the extra strength of an aftermarket arm. I doubt you would notice a difference geometry wise.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2014 | 12:24 PM
  #346  
Scruff's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Thanks dirtman. I'm not really after strength so I'll spend the money elsewhere. Based on what I described as my setup in your opinion is there a benefit in spending any more money on the suspension? Drive mainly mud and rocks with a bit of sand driving.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2014 | 03:35 PM
  #347  
TheDirtman's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

No, not really.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2014 | 12:53 AM
  #348  
Scruff's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Perfect thanks
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 04:20 AM
  #349  
Stephane87's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Default

I finally took of the Daystars 0.75" coil spacers (all around) and put Daystars 1.75" coil spacers (all around). Didn't have to change anything else for now but will put JKS quick disco next. Thanks a lot for the help on this thread

First pic is 0.75" (33" tires) and second is 1.75" (33" tires)

Reply
Old Apr 13, 2014 | 07:52 PM
  #350  
terrabit's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by terrabit
Well, it appears that I have a 1.5" lift. I went back and looked up the item on my purchase order and it is that of a 2.5" lift for a two door JK. This was confirmed by Joe who was timely in his responses up to that point. It appears that the lift hight is in line with what it should be given that these springs are standard for the 1.5" 4 door coil lift. However, this still does not explain why the driver side is 1/2" higher than the other, which is true whether the tank is full or not (a ready explanation when this came up after the initial install). This has been a good learning experience for me, one I won't forget. Thanks anyway.
Update: I just need to add that Joe came through for me in a big way - best customer service experience I've had in a long time. He would have been well within his rights to tell me to kick rocks but he didn't (my issue was 100% user error). The extra bit of travel made all the difference. The ride on these TF springs is great; smooth on the highway but also eats up moderate hits at speed much better than it did before (have yet to crawl them). I'm very pleased. Thanks Joe, my faith in Teraflex is affirmed.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:11 PM.