Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

rock Krawler custom legth CA's

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 23, 2015 | 09:34 PM
  #21  
RoysRig's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 3
From: Mile High Colorado
Default

I'm one of those that has the drivers rear shock body that comes in contact with the bracket. I haven't corrected the issue yet out of laziness. I guess I'm waiting to see if it gets worse.

But on another note, this is how I managed to get my arms torqued while off the Jeep.

Click image for larger version

Name:	20140703_183541.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	71.7 KB
ID:	607861Click image for larger version

Name:	20140703_183557.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	76.1 KB
ID:	607862Click image for larger version

Name:	20140703_191819.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	27.9 KB
ID:	607863Click image for larger version

Name:	20140704_153528.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	45.6 KB
ID:	607864

In that one pick with the bags, that's about 115 pounds of bowling balls keeping the zink rods on the ground while I stand on the big daddy crescent wrench.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2015 | 10:40 PM
  #22  
kjeeper10's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Junkie
Vet Army

 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

Haha, all that held it down ?
Nicely done .. Did you make those or are they actual mounts ?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 04:26 AM
  #23  
DunnyBunny's Avatar
JK Junkie
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 1
From: Bossier City, LA
Default

Originally Posted by kjeeper10
They are 3/8x16x1 or 1.25, either will work. He wants the self tapping bolts. Mark and drill 5/16 then use the bolts to run the threads.
Yep those tge ones I git at fastenal
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 05:07 AM
  #24  
kjeeper10's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Junkie
Vet Army

 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

How many threads are made in the frame rail? I can't see that many ... Maybe 2 at most.
The stock SB mounts use a nut and bolt.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 05:44 AM
  #25  
DunnyBunny's Avatar
JK Junkie
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 1
From: Bossier City, LA
Default

Originally Posted by kjeeper10
How many threads are made in the frame rail? I can't see that many ... Maybe 2 at most.
The stock SB mounts use a nut and bolt.
I will see when I get home. It's not alot. Maybe 3. I know mine is still nice and tight and I used thread lock just to be safe. There is actually a hole in the frame rail that you can get a nut in there if you wanted to.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 06:33 AM
  #26  
kjeeper10's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Junkie
Vet Army

 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by DunnyBunny
I will see when I get home. It's not alot. Maybe 3. I know mine is still nice and tight and I used thread lock just to be safe. There is actually a hole in the frame rail that you can get a nut in there if you wanted to.
Yep, thought about that too. Ok ... Thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 06:47 AM
  #27  
TheDirtman's Avatar
JK Jedi
FJOTM Winner
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 376
From: Southwest Reno, NV
Default

Damn are you being paid to push RK? I know they have really stepped up the propaganda brigad on JKowners. Lately all you do is talk about how great RK is and recommend them to every newb that asks about lifts. People should not have to cut down arms to adjust them shorter. Any kit will will cause things like clearance issues and bowed coils but RK seems to have the worst track record with their design. As one of the bigger lift kit mfg's out there they seem to have more issues then companies like, metalcloack, currie, ORE, clayton, etc. Every time they come out with a new joint the forums are all a buzz about how good they are and how good they flex.

I remember this rhetoric since the original joints came out. 1st gen were a failure, the awesome second gen were a failure and now we have the current joint and they were forced to come out with the new pro flex joint because MC was kicking their ass in the marketplace. The pro crawler joint is ok but far from the best thing on the market and nobody can even utilize the amount of misalignment on a JK the joint offers (like most other current joints on the market). The poor design of pushing the axle back 1" causes extreme coil bowing at 3.5"+ of height is solved with a band aid solution so they can get more money from you. These wedges should be included in the kits as they know what the design does. Moving the axle back 1" while not addressing the alignment of the bracketry really offers no increase in performance and I can't see why that that is perceived as a benefit of the RK kit. Kinda like their 3" stretch kit, not really worth the effort and cost for the benefit you get from such a small stretch.

RK is a fine company and puts out decent products but to be fair to others that are looking at kits, they do have their shortcomings. If their products are a good fit for you then great, I am sure you will get years of quality performance from them.

Ok, let the dirtman bashing and hater comments commence.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 06:53 AM
  #28  
kjeeper10's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Junkie
Vet Army

 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

Not true .. Go to WF RK, Synergy, TF, MC all make great stuff. The point here is the shortened rear arms. I agree with a lot of what you said man. My jeep consist of Synergy steering, EVO Coils, RK arms, TF rear bracket, a mix of shit

Last edited by kjeeper10; Apr 24, 2015 at 07:25 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 09:37 AM
  #29  
DunnyBunny's Avatar
JK Junkie
JK-Forum Ambassador
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 1
From: Bossier City, LA
Default

Originally Posted by TheDirtman
Damn are you being paid to push RK? I know they have really stepped up the propaganda brigad on JKowners. Lately all you do is talk about how great RK is and recommend them to every newb that asks about lifts. People should not have to cut down arms to adjust them shorter. Any kit will will cause things like clearance issues and bowed coils but RK seems to have the worst track record with their design. As one of the bigger lift kit mfg's out there they seem to have more issues then companies like, metalcloack, currie, ORE, clayton, etc. Every time they come out with a new joint the forums are all a buzz about how good they are and how good they flex.

I remember this rhetoric since the original joints came out. 1st gen were a failure, the awesome second gen were a failure and now we have the current joint and they were forced to come out with the new pro flex joint because MC was kicking their ass in the marketplace. The pro crawler joint is ok but far from the best thing on the market and nobody can even utilize the amount of misalignment on a JK the joint offers (like most other current joints on the market). The poor design of pushing the axle back 1" causes extreme coil bowing at 3.5"+ of height is solved with a band aid solution so they can get more money from you. These wedges should be included in the kits as they know what the design does. Moving the axle back 1" while not addressing the alignment of the bracketry really offers no increase in performance and I can't see why that that is perceived as a benefit of the RK kit. Kinda like their 3" stretch kit, not really worth the effort and cost for the benefit you get from such a small stretch.

RK is a fine company and puts out decent products but to be fair to others that are looking at kits, they do have their shortcomings. If their products are a good fit for you then great, I am sure you will get years of quality performance from them.

Ok, let the dirtman bashing and hater comments commence.
Come on dirtman your starting to sound like Eddie. Lol.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 09:44 AM
  #30  
Invest2m4's Avatar
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 2
From: Grosse Pointe, MI
Default

I have to back Dirtman on this one. The propaganda runs deep. The joints have been a series of engineering failures. Having seen pictures of some of their products (e.g. the infamous solid chromoly drag link) that apparently just broke in half, raises questions on material sourcing. I don't fault a product for failing under use - heck, I bent a MC control arm. Material failure due to metallurgical issues is a whole different situation...

Or the common comment of "RK arms are solid and stronger than what's out there." Actually, it is cheap solid bar, which is notably cheaper than DOM. Strength of tube is nearly maxed at 1/4" wall, the rest is just added weight. Diameter is where the strength is - or higher grades of material.

Even what the kit names imply. "I got the Max Travel so I would have more flex." The stock arms will flex the same amount. We're talking 10"-11" travel shocks and most people use so much bump stop, they aren't even adding travel over a stock Jeep.

My new favorite though and something I have been looking at, is the Pro Tie Rod (just the ends, not the whole thing - but I can't get my head around the price for the ends...). They sell the ends for $200 or the whole tie rod for $525. The rod is 1-5/8" 7075. So, that stick of 7075 is priced at $325. Right now, you should be saying the same thing I did, WTF?! Places like Branik or Wide Open Design sell 7075 for about $200 less, machined and ready to go. Anyone who buys the whole thing should have their bank account frozen and an executor appointed.

The comment about the new joints riding better, fails the BS test though.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:26 PM.