Expedition Modded Jeeps - Let's see 'em!!
JK Jedi Master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,800
Likes: 374
From: Midwest City, OK
JK Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: Yukon, Canada
Okay, I found how to recreate the problem: Internet Explorer. Not sure what changed, but in Chrome they display just fine. When I widen the window, then the images get wider within the sidebars. It's a very convenient way to look at finer detail in an image. I'm not sure if MS did something, or if JKF did something, but I haven't changed anything about how I link in images. And, as mentioned, some of the images aren't even mine, anyway. I see that a post in 2013 is displaying exactly the same way.
Last edited by Septu; Feb 24, 2016 at 11:08 AM.
JK Jedi Master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,800
Likes: 374
From: Midwest City, OK
That one wasn't, but the picture in this one is (removed the picture from the quote). It seems to be whatever you're posting goes huge. And it just seems to be your posts that are doing this. I'm also not using IE (use Firefox), however most of your pictures in IE and Firefox do the same thing.
JK Jedi Master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,800
Likes: 374
From: Midwest City, OK
And, BTW, I post URLs to the images, not attachments, unless on my phone. Most folks post attachments, which I find an awkward way to view a dozen or so images. Click open, look, click close, click open, look, click close. Way easier to just scroll down--provided the images are properly sized, LOL.
JK Freak
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish, WA
I see the non-resized images as well. It is not just you mark. If someone attaches a pic it is fine, but if someone links to a high res pic then it shows the full pixels. This forum used to resize viewed image so the page width would have a maximum, but it no longer does. I looked in the settings and did not see that option. I remember when I joined years ago that I selected (was default selection too) resize images in thread.
JK Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: Yukon, Canada
These from 2014 are fine. Expedition Modded Jeeps - Let's see 'em!! - Page 391
This is the first one that I've come across as being huge (08/2014): Although you quoted one below that and it didn't blow it up. But I go to the next page and yours are back to being massive.
Expedition Modded Jeeps - Let's see 'em!! - Page 433
If it was my browser or something on my computer (I've accessed the site off of two different computers today - both with the same issue), then you'd think it would be everyone's pictures that are displaying in their normal/regular size. But the only ones that are huge are yours. : /
On a side note, this has been a great excuse to go back and look at older posts in this thread. Some great rigs, pictures and trips in here!
JK Jedi Master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,800
Likes: 374
From: Midwest City, OK
One from Dec 2012 is fine. Expedition Modded Jeeps - Let's see 'em!! - Page 182
These from 2014 are fine. Expedition Modded Jeeps - Let's see 'em!! - Page 391
This is the first one that I've come across as being huge (08/2014): Although you quoted one below that and it didn't blow it up. But I go to the next page and yours are back to being massive.
Expedition Modded Jeeps - Let's see 'em!! - Page 433
If it was my browser or something on my computer (I've accessed the site off of two different computers today - both with the same issue), then you'd think it would be everyone's pictures that are displaying in their normal/regular size. But the only ones that are huge are yours. : /
On a side note, this has been a great excuse to go back and look at older posts in this thread. Some great rigs, pictures and trips in here!
JK Freak
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 531
Likes: 1
From: Lewisburg, PA
Just FYI Mark. I'm either on my iPad or iPhone and have no issues with your pics. Old, new or otherwise. They all appear as they should.
