Notices
JK Trails & Tales Just get back from a recent trail run and/or camping trip with your Jeep JK Wrangler? If so, you know we want to hear all about where you went, who all came along and of course, see all the pics you can post.

Colorado Trip Pictures [LOTS OF PICS]

Old Jul 27, 2010 | 07:52 PM
  #21  
cthompson's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Conroe, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by The Irish Redfish
WOW! I feel like I just got back from vacationing in Colorado!!! AWESOME POST, CHEERS!

x2 Looks like a great time
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #22  
voodoojk's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: west chester,pa/glenwood springs, co
Default

Originally Posted by interceptor_1972
I always wondered what the plural or moose might be - as did the guy behind the counter up at Pikes Peak.

The thought of Moab was definitely there - but we figured Moab needs a trip all to itself. I'd just be teasing myself by stepping there; plans are for around EJS next year . We'll see what next year brings. Total round trip was right around 3,600 miles this trip I believe - or thereabouts.



Something I noticed during this trip - and maybe someone can help answer the question - is there any co-relation between octane ratings and fuel mileage? Ever since I got into New Mexico, Regular Unleaded was either 85 Octane or 86 Octane and Mid Grade was 87 Octane; in Oklahoma - Regular is 87, Mid Grade 89 and Premium 91. The whole time I was there - except on 2 occasions (once I put 87, and the other 89 by accident) - I used 85 Octane, my average fuel economy was around 18mpg (worst was 16.7). These calculations were not based on the computer readout; my best was 20.2mpg from Grand Junction to Dinosaur. No sooner I got back towards Texas and the average dropped back to around 16.8 or so with 87 Octane Regular. Elevation maybe? Highway speeds I was doing was around 60 - 65mph.
in the Rocky Mountain (high altitude) states, 85 AKI is the minimum octane, and 91 AKI is the maximum octane available in fuel. The reason for this is that in higher-altitude areas, a typical naturally-aspirated engine draws in less air mass per cycle due to the reduced density of the atmosphere. This directly translates to less fuel and reduced absolute compression in the cylinder, therefore deterring knock. It is safe to fill up a carbureted car that normally takes 87 AKI fuel at sea level with 85 AKI fuel in the mountains, but at sea level the fuel may cause damage to the engine. A disadvantage to this strategy is that most turbocharged vehicles are unable to produce full power, even when using the "premium" 91 AKI fuel. In some east coast states, up to 94 AKI is available [1]. In parts of the Midwest (primarily Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois and Missouri) ethanol based E-85 fuel with 105 AKI is available [2]. Often, filling stations near US racing tracks will offer higher octane levels such as 100 AKI. California fuel stations will offer 87, 89, and 91 AKI octane fuels, and at some stations, 100 AKI or higher octane, sold as racing fuel. Until summer 2001 before the phase-out of methyl tert-butyl ether aka MTBE as an octane enhancer additive, 92 AKI was offered in lieu of 91.

this is per wikipedia...they explained it better then i was trying to do lol

Last edited by voodoojk; Jul 27, 2010 at 07:57 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #23  
interceptor_1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,012
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

Originally Posted by The Irish Redfish
WOW! I feel like I just got back from vacationing in Colorado!!! AWESOME POST, CHEERS!
Originally Posted by cthompson
x2 Looks like a great time
Thanks guys! I really wish we had a lot more time to spend there (a good month or two would've been superfantabulous, but I would've definitely settled for a full 2 weeks like we originally planned). It's amazing how time flies when you're having fun - it felt like 10 days passed in 24 - 48 hours. And I must add - KOA Kampgrounds the whole time definitely helped make it more relaxing for the family with kids playground, swimming pools, movies at night, etc. Definitely a memorable vacation!

Originally Posted by voodoojk
in the Rocky Mountain (high altitude) states, 85 AKI is the minimum octane, and 91 AKI is the maximum octane available in fuel. The reason for this is that in higher-altitude areas, a typical naturally-aspirated engine draws in less air mass per cycle due to the reduced density of the atmosphere. This directly translates to less fuel and reduced absolute compression in the cylinder, therefore deterring knock. It is safe to fill up a carbureted car that normally takes 87 AKI fuel at sea level with 85 AKI fuel in the mountains, but at sea level the fuel may cause damage to the engine. A disadvantage to this strategy is that most turbocharged vehicles are unable to produce full power, even when using the "premium" 91 AKI fuel. In some east coast states, up to 94 AKI is available [1]. In parts of the Midwest (primarily Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois and Missouri) ethanol based E-85 fuel with 105 AKI is available [2]. Often, filling stations near US racing tracks will offer higher octane levels such as 100 AKI. California fuel stations will offer 87, 89, and 91 AKI octane fuels, and at some stations, 100 AKI or higher octane, sold as racing fuel. Until summer 2001 before the phase-out of methyl tert-butyl ether aka MTBE as an octane enhancer additive, 92 AKI was offered in lieu of 91.

this is per wikipedia...they explained it better then i was trying to do lol
Hahaha... I was about to say - Mannnnnnnnnnnnn he sure had an awesome technical explanation till I got to the last sentence
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 08:18 PM
  #24  
rickca55's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 23
Likes: 1
From: Rosamond, CA
Default

We have been in Buena Vista, CO, for about a month now and still running great trails and seeing beautiful sceinery.

We are still only scratching the surface of what is here to see and do.

I have posted pictures on photobucket site if you would like to view them.

http://s205.photobucket.com/albums/b...Summer%20Trip/
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 09:39 PM
  #25  
interceptor_1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,012
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

Originally Posted by rickca55
We have been in Buena Vista, CO, for about a month now and still running great trails and seeing beautiful sceinery.

We are still only scratching the surface of what is here to see and do.

I have posted pictures on photobucket site if you would like to view them.

http://s205.photobucket.com/albums/b...Summer%20Trip/
Those are some awesome pictures Rick... if you dont mind my asking, what kind of camera are you using? That's next on the list is to get a good nice camera with a way to charge it in the jeep.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 03:30 AM
  #26  
joshkharris's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Sylvania, Alabama
Default Colorado

Great set of pics....
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #27  
GON WHLN's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 973
Likes: 1
From: Englewood, CO
Default

ok.... I'm moving now
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 07:22 AM
  #28  
isuadam's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 139
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by interceptor_1972
Those are some awesome pictures Rick... if you dont mind my asking, what kind of camera are you using? That's next on the list is to get a good nice camera with a way to charge it in the jeep.
I'll jump in here and just say that DSLR cameras in general do quite a bit better on battery life. Something to do with the way they work, and with the battery packs they come with. Check the specs when it's time to buy and find out how many shutter releases one charge is worth. I have an extra battery pack for my nikon DSLR and each one lasts for weeks, literally, and I can do over 600 shots easily before I even consider putting the battery on the charger. A modern DSLR with two charged battery packs should really do well for your next vacation, especially if you have a couple of nights spent in a hotel or KOA during your two weeks where you can plug in and top the batteries off.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 08:24 AM
  #29  
nmwranglerx's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Thanks for sharing those pics! Looks like a great vacation. We did our second annual Ouray 4th of July camping trip at beginning of month. Ouray is my favorite area to wheel thus far. Nothing hard, but the scenery is just amazing. I feel so lucky to live within 6 hours of this place.
Next time you go to Ouray make sure you do Poughkeepsie Gulch off of Engineer's Pass. It has some fun wheeling obstacles and spectacular view of Lake Como.

A couple of shots:

Climbing up Poughkeepsie Gulch wall ...



View of Lake Como from above along the trail...

Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 09:19 AM
  #30  
interceptor_1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Jedi
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,012
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

Originally Posted by joshkharris
Great set of pics....
Thanks Hopefully, the next time will be better with a real DSLR and not shots taken through the bug-ridden windshield driving 55mph down the road with a cell phone

Originally Posted by GON WHLN
ok.... I'm moving now
Wait for meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!! Trust me, if I could, I would in a hurry. Granted I've not been to all 50 states, but of the ones I've been to, Colorado tops the list - would love to live somewhere within a few hours drive of Ouray. Heck, I'd settle for a cabin we saw on Picayne Gulch trail

Originally Posted by NebRedrocker
Looks like a great time. btw Those were elk instead of deer. They have sort of a dark "main" where a deer doesnt.
I am jealous of the trip, I'm hoping in sept. wife and I may head out that way.
It definitely was. And yes, I know - I need to go back and edit my post to fix the deer/elk thing . Hope you and your wife get to go - not sure how the weather is in September, but it's definitely a well worth trip that'll leave you wanting to go back.

Originally Posted by isuadam
I'll jump in here and just say that DSLR cameras in general do quite a bit better on battery life. Something to do with the way they work, and with the battery packs they come with. Check the specs when it's time to buy and find out how many shutter releases one charge is worth. I have an extra battery pack for my nikon DSLR and each one lasts for weeks, literally, and I can do over 600 shots easily before I even consider putting the battery on the charger. A modern DSLR with two charged battery packs should really do well for your next vacation, especially if you have a couple of nights spent in a hotel or KOA during your two weeks where you can plug in and top the batteries off.
Agreed. Ever since we got back, a good chunk of time has been spent researching DSLR cameras; and I started off with the Canon Rebel T1i, Nikon D5000, Pentax K-x and a Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 and the more I read, the more I'm leaning towards the Nikon D5000. I figured an extended life 2nd battery will be definitely on the list, as would some sort of a car charger in case of an emergency. Part of the battery save on DSLRs have to do with getting more manual controls (zoom, focus, etc.) which reduces power spent on motor movements, plus the option to add a separate flash that uses AA/AAA batteries will also help on the flash using up a lot of charge. So, that's definitely in the works for down the line - may make for a nice self christmas gift . Thanks for the input though.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:52 AM.