Instead of death woble...OUCH!
So instead of just dropping his internals into a new d30 (take-off, factory, teraflex, whatever) he would be paying for a 'complete' factory 44. Then paying, again, to rip it apart and have new sleeves installed. Then, probably, paying to have a truss welded on since the sleeves alone didn't stop the break? At some point in the cash outlay, it has to make more sense to bypass a factory replacement (plus the additional build costs) and look aftermarket.

Which way to go with it just depends on the budget and what the insurance company decides. Hopefully they are cool with cutting a check and letting him choose how it gets spent.
The Tera 30 has 3.25" tubes that are 1/4" wall. Your ProRock has a smaller tube and a slightly thicker (5/16") wall. I'm no engineer, but an engineer friend told me that a larger diameter tube, even with a slightly thinner wall, will resist bending more. So, based on his knowledge and experience, the Tera 30 is less likely to bend than the ProRock 44. Just to be clear, I do not own a Dana 30, a Tera 30, or a ProRock.
Is that normal? Does everyone with sleeves drill multiple holes in their axle tube? The crack formed at the hole. The hole and subsequent welding made a weak spot which caused the crack. Am I really the only one bringing this up?
In a perfect world, yes, multiple holes would be drilled in the axle followed by pounding the sleeves in followed by plug welding all holes. Many people get lazy and just pound the sleeves in, assuming that the extra wall thickness will be alright.
I do not believe that drilling a hole and plug welding will create a weak spot. On the contrary, if done right, that spot would be even stronger than the rest.
There's no substitute for thicker wall tubes. Sleeves add some strength, but obviously, not enough. I lean towards trusses over sleeves, myself. The truss is welded (mostly) down the entire length of the tube. Seems like it would be engineered to be stronger over a sleeve. But, I am no engineer. I have seen photos of failed tubes that were sleeved. I'm sure it has happened, but I haven't seen anyone with a failed trussed housing to date. I would be interested to hear about those circumstances if anyone knows of it.
https://www.jk-forum.com/forums/modi...n-axle-318231/
I think I have only seen 2 other reports of shattered housings with trusses since I asked about it in that thread.
And the first link in post #30 is an interesting read, for people who have an hour or two to waste...
There are hammer in sleeves which do not require welding.
I do not believe that drilling a hole and plug welding will create a weak spot. On the contrary, if done right, that spot would be even stronger than the rest.
There's no substitute for thicker wall tubes. Sleeves add some strength, but obviously, not enough. I lean towards trusses over sleeves, myself. The truss is welded (mostly) down the entire length of the tube. Seems like it would be engineered to be stronger over a sleeve. But, I am no engineer. I have seen photos of failed tubes that were sleeved. I'm sure it has happened, but I haven't seen anyone with a failed trussed housing to date. I would be interested to hear about those circumstances if anyone knows of it.
I do not believe that drilling a hole and plug welding will create a weak spot. On the contrary, if done right, that spot would be even stronger than the rest.
There's no substitute for thicker wall tubes. Sleeves add some strength, but obviously, not enough. I lean towards trusses over sleeves, myself. The truss is welded (mostly) down the entire length of the tube. Seems like it would be engineered to be stronger over a sleeve. But, I am no engineer. I have seen photos of failed tubes that were sleeved. I'm sure it has happened, but I haven't seen anyone with a failed trussed housing to date. I would be interested to hear about those circumstances if anyone knows of it.
The photo is proof that drilling a hole and welding it up caused it to be weaker. Look at it like this. If you drilled a hole in a 20 foot pipe, welded it up, bent it till it broke, and it broke exactly on that weld, the hole/weld was the problem. That is exactly what we are seeing here. Had the hole not been related to the issue at all, it would not have broken at dead center of that hole. The odds of it just happening to nail that hole dead on are very small.
Tera Flex has a Dana 30 replacement axle. Much better built than stock, stronger, beefier, set up for lifted JKs...
Other than a bigger/stronger ring and pinion in a TF Dana 44 is there a good reason NOT to get the TF replacement Dana 30?
My wheeling is mild, no mudding, no extreme rocks. No locked different either.
Other than a bigger/stronger ring and pinion in a TF Dana 44 is there a good reason NOT to get the TF replacement Dana 30?
My wheeling is mild, no mudding, no extreme rocks. No locked different either.
A Dana 30 is still a Dana 30, even an aftermarket one, and still has the inherent weaknesses of the overall design. And what you'd spend on that aftermarket Dana 30 wouldn't be far from an aftermarket Dana 44-based housing, so why not do it right the first time and get a 44? And if/when you decide to step up your off-roading a notch or two, you won't have to worry about whether or not your front axle is stronger enough to handle it.
A Pro-Rock 44, Tera44, or Core 44 have some of the shit-issues of the D30/D44 primarily ball joints and unit bearings) but with greatly increased tube and casting rigidity and strength along with D44 gears, huge inner C's and a housing that will not flex and stress the axle shafts and gears under extreme situations.Trying to compare a D30/D44 Mopar/Dana OEM axle to an Aftermarket is just silly. Sure, you can still talk balls/bearings. But that's about the end of where you can compare them. Show me the list of ProRock 44 broken gears, Tera 44 broken gears or the Core 44 broken gears. They will be like finding hens teeth!
Obviously a Mopar/Dana 30/44 is not strong enough, being that you broke a sleeved one. D30/44 are the same damn thing aside from the cast center and inner spline count. So an aftermarket axle housing is what you want.
Some engineering numbers:
Going from 2-3/4"x1/4" and stepping up to 3"x1/2" gives you a 105% increase in torsion and stiffness (bending).
Going from 3-1/2"x1/4" and moving to a 3"x1/2" tube is a 6% increase in torsion and stiffness.
So the 3.5"x.25" wall is almost the same but doing it with much less weight. Adding diameter adds strength much easier than thickness.
The weld at the break point had a defect that created a stress riser. The flaw began to propagate and travelled into the tube and became catastrophic.
The 1-ton thing is all great and well if you want to go down the rabbit hole.... but an aftermarket 44 is a simple 3-4 hour bolt in deal at your house. It's clean and easy. Plug and play. Yea, you still have small unit bearings and small ball joints that will die every couple years, but that's silly/easy shit compared to shattering housings and gears out on the trail.
I destroyed my D30 (sold it's corpse to Chuck the Ripper) and moved to the Dynatrac ProRock 44 Unlimited with the 1/2" HD tube. For me, this was the only option that I could agree with. I looked at the options, did some calcs, compared costs, spoke to NorthRidge, drank beer and read tons and tons of articles and no matter what, the PR44U HD was always the best choice for my situation.







