Originally Posted by Rugged_Ridge

(3) Current low mount intake point - This has been the biggest issue to figure out. The mount has to be out and away from the flow of water on the hood. Not an issue driving so much as sitting still. We needed the intake low for a clean look but this places it in the path of water running off the Jeep when sitting still. When you’re on the trail you’re not moving at 50+mph. The intake off to the side takes care of this. Location of main body intake is still located on top. The cover channels the air up from the side and needs to pass a foam pre-filter before entering the housing. After driving for 3-4 hours in different rain conditions this weekend I had little or no water inside of main housing. Also note, the main housing has a water trap and a system to allow extra water to be removed. WE ARE STILL exploring other options but we must keep the intake a given size. Current location is 36" further back and 5" higher than stock intake. This is measured from the lowest point of the intake. This covers 99% off all your needs regarding water. If you need something taller than we have the high intake.... Besides you’re going to have other issues to deal with going that deep .... Just saying . ALSO.. the Mango Tango has cut fenders and 37” tires… Got a lot of spray. You guys with no fenders…? Can’t solve all the problems just yet but again that tall mount answers this issue.

Originally Posted by Rugged_Ridge

Now to try to cover the concerns..

(1) View out the w/s - where it is located does not affect view as bad as it might look. Drove it all weekend and did not have a problem at all... Wife rode in the passenger side and never even noticed it... (Maybe that’s not so good? ). RHD guys.... What can I say. You drive on the wrong side anyway.. . Low mount is for you.. If sales are good than we can look into more world market products like CRD air box size and location...