Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Superchips Flashpaq for JK, Initial Impressions

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 03:13 AM
  #561  
edwin907's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 783
Likes: 3
From: Southeast
Default

Originally Posted by dpoelstra
"If you have a GPS, select your tire size using it. A lot of people have had some erroneous tire size numbers even when using the recommended SC way to measure them. Besides that, it could be some PCM catching up, but I have always noticed an immediate improvement when going from stock.
"

Your right about this. I have fairly new 35x12.50/17 KM2's. I had to go to 33.25 inches on the Tuner to get the correct reading compared to the GPS. It is now dead on.[/QUOTE]

33.25 for my Toyo 35's and the speedo is within 0.5 mph of my GPS.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 03:28 AM
  #562  
JKsJK's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Rogers, AR
Default

Originally Posted by Scooter Scott
So I just got mine...and I'm not impressed! Background:

32" tires on 3.73's Automatic
Going topless/Doorless to Jeep Run today

One of the primary reasons I got this was to help my JK from searchin for gears. I had a Procal on it at first which helped GREATLY. I moved the JK back to stock and installed the 87 performance tune, calibrated the tires and did not touch anything else. I don't notice a friggan difference! The whole way to my Jeep run today it was searching for gears and primarily staying in 3rd while doing between 70-75. I haven't felt a difference between the Procal and this...I'm confused

I know that regearing is the only way to get it back to close to stock but I can't afford it right now so please do not mention that. Maybe I just set my expectations too high.
as I mentioned earlier, there have been a lot of people on here very please with sc, including myself, which I think may have raised the expectation level for some. That said, I still honestly believe you would have noticed a difference from stock. I don't have an automatic, so I can't comment from that perspective, but if the install took properly I find it hard to believe you noticed nothing. You might try a reinstall. I had problems with my first install, which seemed to take fine but clearly didn't.

If it still doesn't perform how you want it to, then maybe the procal is best for you.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #563  
Dwikto's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: RSM, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Dwikto
COMPLETELY AGREE WAS I JUST POSTED THIS ON ANOTHER THREAD:


been running the 91 for a couple days no 93 octane gas around here and can not tell the difference from the 87 setting (which I love by the way) I did notice some good MPG though; 19mpg at 70 mph on flat ground. and 19.4 at 65mph. I was getting 17 with hypertech at 65 and 16.5 at 70 mph, however when I first used my hypertech my numbers were about the same. I think the jeep computer finds away to compensate with fuel mixture and negate the mpg after a while. I am a very consistant driver and my commute is the same everyday. Unless I try some octane booster that will raise me 2 full points I will go back to the 87 which is increadible. I will keep messing with the active features you can use while driving, but my 0-60 times are embarrasing so this is the last report on those. (I know not a racecar whatever)

Stock: Unknown 0-60
87 tune: Running 87 gas 11.84 with and without O/D 0-60
91 tune: Running 91 gas 11.25 with and without O/D 0-60
93 tune: Unknown (no 93 octane gas to run) 0-60
Tow tune: Unknown I drive freeways everyday this probably will be worse for my commute.

dan
i ran the tow tune today and my 0-60 was 11.34 and believe it or not I got 21mpg at 64mph, It actually surprised me as I have a mainly freeway commute and I loved it. I am going to go back to 87 tune though because I do not want to waste money on gas. I will keep playing around with it.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 09:43 AM
  #564  
JKsJK's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Rogers, AR
Default

That's funny, I just went to the tow tune thus weekend also. I already had 91 in the tank and decided to run this for a month or so. Trying to give each a couple tankfulls before deciding which to stick with. The tow tune seems to be a pretty good little tune for around town. I'm not towing anything, but thought I would check results anyway.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #565  
Camojeep's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Yakima, WA
Default Settings?

Reading the forum, several people mention an 87 Performance setting is this the same as just the 87 setting (Quick Tune) or is the Peformance setting in the AdvancedTuning?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #566  
Locklain's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Crandon, WI
Default

Originally Posted by grayghost
Reading the forum, several people mention an 87 Performance setting is this the same as just the 87 setting (Quick Tune) or is the Peformance setting in the AdvancedTuning?
One and the same as far as I know. The Quicktune settings will set everything needed automatically whereas the advanced tune will allow you to adjust other options such as gearing, tire size, and a few other options.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #567  
JKsJK's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Rogers, AR
Default

Originally Posted by grayghost
Reading the forum, several people mention an 87 Performance setting is this the same as just the 87 setting (Quick Tune) or is the Peformance setting in the AdvancedTuning?
it's the same. i think the advance tuning option let's you do other things like adjust gears, tire size, etc., but it's the same performance tune.

edit: or, what locklain said
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #568  
david950's Avatar
JK Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Broussard, LA
Default Does anyone here tow a boat?

I towed my 18' Skeeter bass boat this weekend for the first time with my '09 Unlimited Rubicon (auto). Stock everything except for front bumper and 3/4" front lift. I was disappointed to have to switch the O/D off, as I was unable to hold 70 mph (GPS) with cruise without hunting for gears quite frequently, even on dead flat surfaces.

Once I switched O/D off, all was well, but boy did my mileage take a beating (ended up an indicated 11+ for the 200 mile trip, and I know the computer is optimistic). I know a RAM diesel is a better tow vehicle, but it ain't in the cards. I also know there's no such thing as a free lunch, and towing with anything short of a diesel will put the hurt on mileage. That said, I feel like I would "maximize" my experience if I could get the boost necessary to run at highway speeds in top gear.

So, has anyone with the Superchips Flashpaq actually towed anything? If so, care to share?

Oh, I should say that I won't be ordering it, regardless of whatever else it does, if it can't defeat my boat trailer's TPMS sensors - sorry, couldn't resist.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2009 | 09:34 AM
  #569  
artpics's Avatar
JK Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Calabasas - CA & London
Default

70mph towing a boat what did you expect?
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2009 | 09:51 AM
  #570  
JPop's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, OH
Default

What's the weight of the boat and trailer?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:15 PM.