Notices
Modified JK Tech Tech related bulletin board forum regarding subjects such as suspension, tires & wheels, steering, bumpers, skid plates, drive train, cages, on-board air and other useful modifications that will help improve the performance and protection of your Jeep JK Wrangler (Rubicon, Sahara, Unlimited and X) on the trail.

PLEASE DO NOT START SHOW & TELL TYPE THREADS IN THIS FORUM

Superchips Flashpaq for JK, Initial Impressions

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #671  
Lee's Avatar
Lee
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine, Texas
Default

What gears do you have?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 07:46 PM
  #672  
Lee's Avatar
Lee
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine, Texas
Default

His name is Ruger. He's a nine year old Weimerainer. I like your pup too!
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 07:20 AM
  #673  
R0ck's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Got my Superchips from Northridge last night!
I got it all updated this morning before work, but I still have about a half tank of 85 octane; our lower grade here in the mountains. We have 85, 87, 91. I'm going to try the 87 Performance Tune first, but should I wait until I my next fill up with 87 octane or would I be okay with the 85 octane at high altitude (5,430 ft)?
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 07:38 AM
  #674  
JKsJK's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Rogers, AR
Default

Originally Posted by R0ck
Got my Superchips from Northridge last night!
I got it all updated this morning before work, but I still have about a half tank of 85 octane; our lower grade here in the mountains. We have 85, 87, 91. I'm going to try the 87 Performance Tune first, but should I wait until I my next fill up with 87 octane or would I be okay with the 85 octane at high altitude (5,430 ft)?
you'll be fine with 85 - won't do any harm, you just won't get 100% of the benefit. it will take a little while for it to all work out anyway, so i would go ahead and install it.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 07:44 AM
  #675  
RATM's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Blarsville or McDonough, GA
Default

One of my jobbers ordered a SC for me today and I will dyno it on a DynoJet to see what it will or will not do....
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 07:52 AM
  #676  
RichRock's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Inland Empire-SoCal
Default

Mine is "out for delivery". OOOh the suspense!
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 08:04 AM
  #677  
JPop's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, OH
Default

Originally Posted by R0ck
Got my Superchips from Northridge last night!
I got it all updated this morning before work, but I still have about a half tank of 85 octane; our lower grade here in the mountains. We have 85, 87, 91. I'm going to try the 87 Performance Tune first, but should I wait until I my next fill up with 87 octane or would I be okay with the 85 octane at high altitude (5,430 ft)?
Because you are at such high altitude, you just can't get the same amount of air in which is why you have the lower 85 grade. The one stop down in fuel grade (from 87 to 85) will burn at about the same efficiency as 87 would at closer to sea level. So I would just place the octane rating on the Flashpaq at 2 above what your putting in the tank, and let the PCM sort the rest out.

BTW, the air has about 20% less density than what the majority of us our dealing with, making it harder to burn all the fuel your pouring in, hens the quicker burning low octane you have available.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 09:08 AM
  #678  
R0ck's Avatar
JK Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by JPop
Because you are at such high altitude, you just can't get the same amount of air in which is why you have the lower 85 grade. The one stop down in fuel grade (from 87 to 85) will burn at about the same efficiency as 87 would at closer to sea level. So I would just place the octane rating on the Flashpaq at 2 above what your putting in the tank, and let the PCM sort the rest out.

BTW, the air has about 20% less density than what the majority of us our dealing with, making it harder to burn all the fuel your pouring in, hens the quicker burning low octane you have available.
So by placing the Flashpaq at 2 above you mean if I'm putting in 85, set it to 87, putting in 87 set it to 91, and so on? Or am I misunderstanding what you meant?
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 09:23 AM
  #679  
JPop's Avatar
Thread Starter
JK Junkie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, OH
Default

Originally Posted by R0ck
So by placing the Flashpaq at 2 above you mean if I'm putting in 85, set it to 87, putting in 87 set it to 91, and so on? Or am I misunderstanding what you meant?
Yep, that's pretty much it. With the 3 Octane levels you have available (85, 87, 91) I probably avoid the mid-grade. I also would revert back to Octane levels as normal if you are going to be under 3,000 feet for extended periods.

So at your altitude I would run as follows,

85 Octane for 87 setting and Mileage XS

91 Octane for 93 and Tow setting
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #680  
Atl JK's Avatar
JK Super Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 3
From: Aurora, CO
Default

Yeah, I'm in Denver and I can't tell much of a power drop off around town from how it felt in Atlanta. I think its due to my CAI and flashpaq. It does start to struggle a little in the mountains above 9000'. The CAI sounds different too, its a kind of strange hollow sound. Makes sense though...

I've been running 87 (mid grade) on the 87 tune. Maybe I should try 85 with the 87 tune. No scratch that I'll run 91 in it next tank (and the appropriate tune) and see if I can tell a difference.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:16 AM.